Appeals Court Upholds Napster Injunction -- A three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals today issued a 58-page opinion in which it held that the popular peer-to-peer song-swapping service Napster must stop enabling users to access copyrighted material served by Napster users. The Appeals Court action follows an injunction against Napster originally issued 26-Jul-00 by Judge Marylin Patel, which barred Napster from "causing, assisting, facilitating, copying, or otherwise distributing all copyrighted songs or musical compositions." Two judges on the Appeals Court issued a temporary stay against that injunction almost immediately, pending arguments from both Napster and the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA), who is suing Napster for copyright infringement and promoting piracy. (See "Judge Presses Napster's Buttons" in TidBITS-541.) The Appeals Court decision permits Napster to remain in operation until Judge Patel modifies her original "overbroad" injunction. However, the decision also requires Napster to prevent users from accessing content that would violate copyright and finds Napster had both actual and constructive knowledge of direct copyright infringement. Napster could be held liable for failing to monitor its system for copyright violations, as well as for contributory copyright infringement. Napster is expected to appeal the decision to the full Appeals Court or even to the U.S. Supreme Court; the full text of the decision is available from FindLaw.com.

In a move partially aimed at placating the recording industry, Napster partner Bertelsman's CEO announced recently that the service would start charging a monthly fee for users as early as June 2001 as a way of paying labels and artists, although no details of how such a payment system would compensate artists have been released. Napster currently claims to have more than 50 million users, and estimates place the number of downloads via Napster in January alone at 2 billion. [GD]

<http://www.napster.com/>
<http://www.riaa.org/>
<http://db.tidbits.com/article/06056>
<http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/ getcase.pl?court=9th&navby=case& amp;no=0016401>