home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.physics:18378 sci.bio:4069
- Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.bio
- Path: sparky!uunet!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!galois!riesz!jbaez
- From: jbaez@riesz.mit.edu (John C. Baez)
- Subject: Re: Some physics questions
- Message-ID: <1992Nov7.192950.23136@galois.mit.edu>
- Sender: news@galois.mit.edu
- Nntp-Posting-Host: riesz
- Organization: MIT Department of Mathematics, Cambridge, LA
- References: <1992Nov6.175022.13136@galois.mit.edu> <6NOV199212364099@csa1.lbl.gov> <1detccINNkst@chnews.intel.com>
- Distribution: na
- Date: Sat, 7 Nov 92 19:29:50 GMT
- Lines: 21
-
- In article <1detccINNkst@chnews.intel.com> bhoughto@sedona.intel.com (Blair P. Houghton) writes:
- >In article <6NOV199212364099@csa1.lbl.gov> sichase@csa1.lbl.gov (SCOTT I CHASE) writes:
- >>Scott I. Chase "It is not a simple life to be a single cell,
- >>SICHASE@CSA2.LBL.GOV although I have no right to say so, having
- >> been a single cell so long ago myself that I
- >> have no memory at all of that stage of my
- >> life." - Lewis Thomas
- >
- >Here's where I prove I slept through biology (and that I
- >have the balls to take on the ideas of people like Lewis Thomas):
- >
- >Before the sperm enters the egg, it isn't you, and after
- >it enters the egg, it's not a single cell, it's two cells,
- >or something entirely different. Right or wrong?
-
- I'm sure Lewis Thomas wasn't identifying unduly with his dad's sperm.
- As far as I can tell, he's referring to the continuity of life and the
- fact that you can in theory trace all our cells back to single-celled
- ancestors. Then the "so long ago" makes sense and the "I" is a grand
- exaggeration.
-
-