home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!think.com!ames!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!csa1.lbl.gov!sichase
- From: sichase@csa1.lbl.gov (SCOTT I CHASE)
- Newsgroups: sci.physics
- Subject: Re: Some physics questions
- Date: 6 Nov 1992 12:36 PST
- Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory - Berkeley, CA, USA
- Lines: 25
- Distribution: na
- Message-ID: <6NOV199212364099@csa1.lbl.gov>
- References: <3NOV199212323281@csa2.lbl.gov> <23651@galaxy.ucr.edu> <5NOV199211284285@csa2.lbl.gov> <1992Nov6.175022.13136@galois.mit.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.3.254.196
- News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41
-
- In article <1992Nov6.175022.13136@galois.mit.edu>, jbaez@riesz.mit.edu (John C. Baez) writes...
- >
- >As the rest of my post indicated, that wasn't the part that I don't
- >buy!! I can imagine a theory that predicts mixing angles, but not a
- >theory that predicts the speed of light (in any exciting sense - see my
- >previous post).
-
- Why not? What makes the speed of light any more fundamental than the charge
- of an electron, or the electroweak mixing angle? And even if it's more
- fundamental, what prevents you, in principle, from developing a theory which
- predicts the speed of light?
-
- We're getting a little philosophical here, but I would argue as follows:
-
- The speed of light is what it is for *some* reason, or it would have a
- different value! (I know I'll get flamed for this one.) I expect that
- this reason will ultimately be accessible to us.
-
- -Scott
- --------------------
- Scott I. Chase "It is not a simple life to be a single cell,
- SICHASE@CSA2.LBL.GOV although I have no right to say so, having
- been a single cell so long ago myself that I
- have no memory at all of that stage of my
- life." - Lewis Thomas
-