home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.philosophy.tech:4057 sci.philosophy.meta:2539 sci.classics:990
- Newsgroups: sci.philosophy.tech,sci.philosophy.meta,sci.classics
- Path: sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!malgudi.oar.net!news.ans.net!cmcl2!panix!jk
- From: jk@panix.com (Jim Kalb)
- Subject: Re: Plato's Views on Women
- Message-ID: <1992Nov12.032037.6155@panix.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 03:20:37 GMT
- References: <BxIKsp.Gt3@unx.sas.com> <1992Nov11.010102.14565@cheshire.oxy.edu> <BxK1zu.93q@unx.sas.com> <1992Nov11.210624.15383@cheshire.oxy.edu>
- Organization: Institute for the Human Sciences
- Keywords: politics, women, feminism
- Lines: 18
-
- In <1992Nov11.210624.15383@cheshire.oxy.edu> rooney@cheshire.oxy.edu (Michael Sean Rooney) writes:
-
- >It is the
- >positions and arguments that are central, items which seem anathema to
- >the anti-feminist-philosophy posters on this thread.
-
- It might focus the discussion if someone would expound and defend a
- philosophical position on an issue with no obvious immediate social or
- political implications (something relating to logic or epistemology,
- say) that is distinctively feminist. I'm not claiming the burden of
- proof is on the defenders of feminist philosophy, only that it might
- advance things if we all could see an example of what's being
- discussed.
- --
- Jim Kalb "Not drunk is he who from the floor
- (jk@panix.com) can rise alone and still drink more.
- But drunk is he who prostrate lies
- Without the power to drink or rise." (Clough)
-