home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.logic:1968 sci.philosophy.meta:2429
- Newsgroups: sci.logic,sci.philosophy.meta
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!concert!sas!mozart.unx.sas.com!sasghm
- From: sasghm@theseus.unx.sas.com (Gary Merrill)
- Subject: Re: Natural Kinds (was re: Are all crows black?)
- Originator: sasghm@theseus.unx.sas.com
- Sender: news@unx.sas.com (Noter of Newsworthy Events)
- Message-ID: <BxGB5w.7ys@unx.sas.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 13:37:08 GMT
- References: <1992Nov4.200546.2196@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU> <Bx8yvo.6ty@unx.sas.com> <1992Nov8.210316.5922@dcs.qmw.ac.uk> <1992Nov9.010144.18902@samba.oit.unc.edu>
- Nntp-Posting-Host: theseus.unx.sas.com
- Organization: SAS Institute Inc.
- Lines: 18
-
-
- In article <1992Nov9.010144.18902@samba.oit.unc.edu>, Robert.Vienneau@launchpad.unc.edu (Robert Vienneau) writes:
-
- |> I think one should also have some idea of what criteria 20th century
- |> philosophers have put forward to demarcate science from non-science. I'd
- |> like to suggest that if one is going to sound like one knows what one is
- |> talking about, one should have at least a passing acquaintance with the
- |> ideas of Karl Popper, Thomas Kuhn, Imre Lakatos, and Paul Feyerabend.
-
- I'd like to suggest that this would provide a pretty narrow perspective
- on 20th century philosophy of science since it provides a view from
- only one particular "school" or "tradition". Indeed, it is neither the
- "received view" nor representative of the bulk of work in the philosophy
- of science over (say) the last 20 years.
- --
- Gary H. Merrill [Principal Systems Developer, C Compiler Development]
- SAS Institute Inc. / SAS Campus Dr. / Cary, NC 27513 / (919) 677-8000
- sasghm@theseus.unx.sas.com ... !mcnc!sas!sasghm
-