home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky news.sysadmin:1430 news.admin:8506 news.admin.policy:340
- Path: sparky!uunet!gossip.pyramid.com!olivea!sun-barr!ames!kronos.arc.nasa.gov!iscnvx!netcomsv!ulogic!hartman
- From: hartman@ulogic.UUCP (Richard M. Hartman)
- Newsgroups: news.sysadmin,news.admin,news.admin.policy
- Subject: Re: a.b.p.e. distribution (was, Re: Does USENET condone CHILD PORNOGRAPHY?)
- Keywords: Pedophelia Child Pornography Porn Immoral Illegal
- Message-ID: <577@ulogic.UUCP>
- Date: 12 Nov 92 17:08:50 GMT
- References: <josh.721334651@mowgli> <1992Nov9.145214.19489@ms.uky.edu> <BxICEJ.IGy@mtholyoke.edu>
- Followup-To: news.sysadmin,news.admin,news.admin.policy,alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.d
- Distribution: na
- Organization: negligable
- Lines: 21
-
- All or nothing for alt? That seems arbitrary. Why not all or nothing
- for alt.binaries (justification: disk space larger than any alt sub-tree)
- That's not censorship, just an administrative decision. Why not all or nothing
- for alt.binaries.pictures (justification: non-productive compared to
- alt.binaries.somethingelse).
-
- ANY decision you make regarding what to carry (or not) can be regarded
- as either censorship or "administrative choice" depending upon who's
- arguing.
-
- Not carry alt.*? Why that's censorship! Carrying only the establisment
- sanctioned snowy-pure "official" heirarchy is suppression of my freedom
- of expression!
-
- See what I mean?
-
- -Richard Hartman
- hartman@ulogic.COM
-
- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
- glockh belvars: cannot recover
-