home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!pmafire!news.dell.com!swrinde!sdd.hp.com!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!ames!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!cbmvax!bj
- From: bj@cbmvax.commodore.com (Brian Jackson - Amiga Networking)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
- Subject: Re: Networking? WHY?!?
- Message-ID: <36840@cbmvax.commodore.com>
- Date: 10 Nov 92 17:09:04 GMT
- References: <jbono.07v8@tension.UUCP>
- Reply-To: bj@cbmvax.commodore.com (Brian Jackson - Amiga Networking)
- Organization: Commodore, West Chester, PA
- Lines: 63
-
- In article <jbono.07v8@tension.UUCP> jbono@tension.UUCP (John Bono) writes:
-
- >I've seen a few posts up here about how the Amiga doesn't have "built-in"
- >networking, and it seems to me that adding networking as a standard feature
- >would be a tremendous waste of time. Virtually *no* clones have any
- >networking "built in." They all are rather expensive aftermarket options,
- >especially in light of the software cost.
-
- Most clones have _nothing_ built in. That's where the folks make their
- money on the things - by selling the other things that you need to make
- it work. If the Amiga market was the clone market ... The aftermarket
- networking options are expensive because, currently, if you need
- networking, you _need_ it. So they've got you.
-
- There is nothing inherently expensive (or difficult) in adding decent
- hardware support for networking on the Amiga. The software is already
- pretty much there.
-
- >Macs have appletalk networking, but compared to Token-Ring or Ethernet
- >based Networks, apple talk sucks rocks, and is not very useful in large
- >environments with heavy network traffic.
-
- I suspect that you'd be surprised at the value AppleTalk has to folks.The
- fact is that a LOT of people use, like and suffer with it and that it's
- existance sells a lot of machines. The fact is that the ability to _easily_
- connect your machines together is a valuable one that many users want now
- and that more users will want in the future.
-
- >The only thing I would like to see out of C= is a network.device, and a
- >network.library as an OPTIONAL feature to the OS, which would include
- >standard drivers for Novell, TCP/IP, Vines, Lantastic, as well as some sort
- >of server capability. The Amiga does have a multitasking OS after all, and
- >the bus is definitely faster than the majority of the "servers" advanced by
- >the clone community.
-
- >Spending gazillions of dollars trying to get 500s, 600s, and 1200s
- >networking is a waste of money, as noone I know would want a low end
- >machine like that as a workstation or server.
-
- This is a pretty narrow vision and one that is based upon what -you- think
- "everyone" or "no one" would want. With an inexpensive but (relatively)
- fast networking scheme on _all_ Amigas, the games folks could have a field
- day with multi-player games and things like the A500/A600/A1200 could be
- used as _inexpensive_ smart terminals connected to anything larger.
-
- Btw, Commodore doesn't spend "gazillions" of dollars on anything. :) (?)
-
- >HOWEVER, an A2000/3000/4000 based network is a different story, because
- >those machines are far more likely to be used in a productivity
- >environment.
-
- Yes, and they would all make great servers for the low-end machines :)
-
- >John
-
- Use your imagination, John.
-
- Brian
- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
- Brian Jackson Amiga Networking Group, Commodore-Amiga Inc.
- bj@cbmvax.commodore.com
- {uunet|rutgers}!cbmvax!bj or networking@cbmvax.commodore.com
- uva uvam vivendo varia fit
-