home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.math
- Path: sparky!uunet!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!galois!riesz!jbaez
- From: jbaez@riesz.mit.edu (John C. Baez)
- Subject: Re: Proof of God's Existence
- Message-ID: <1992Sep16.012904.16257@galois.mit.edu>
- Keywords: . . . and that's all what I am!
- Sender: news@galois.mit.edu
- Nntp-Posting-Host: riesz
- Organization: MIT Department of Mathematics, Cambridge, MA
- References: <8815@amsaa-cleo.brl.mil> <1992Sep5.200902.1@tnclus.tele.nokia.fi> <8967@amsaa-cleo.brl.mil>
- Date: Wed, 16 Sep 92 01:29:04 GMT
- Lines: 27
-
- In article <8967@amsaa-cleo.brl.mil> matt@amsaa-cleo.brl.mil (Matt Rosenblatt) writes:
- >For those who have never heard of him, Popeye is a fictional American
- >cartoon and comic-strip character. He is the one who gains superhuman
- >strengh whenever he eats a can of spinach. In his own dialect, his
- >slogan is,
- >
- > "I YAM WHAT I YAM, AND THAT'S ALL WHAT I YAM,
- > I'M POPEYE, THE SAILOR MAN."
- >
- >With all that, no matter how many times he asserts, "I AM WHAT I AM,"
- >he is still a fictional character. Therefore, one may not prove the
- >existence of a being solely on the basis that he is quoted as having
- >said, "I AM WHAT I AM." Let Popeye appear in thunder and lightning
- >and smoke to six hundred thousand men with their wives and children
- >and tell them, "I AM," and then I'll believe he exists.
-
- Thanks, I was waiting for someone to say that - but I don't think Hannu
- will cease his space potato reasoning due to this clarification. After
- all, Popeye isn't omnipotent the way God is, so he can't prove his own
- existence just by claiming he exists. :-) Maybe some more
- spinach might do it?
-
- I'm surprised, actually, that nobody has brought up the most venerable
- proof of God's existence - proof by repetition. "What I tell you three
- times is true," said the Butcher.
-
-
-