home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!overload!dillon
- From: dillon@overload.Berkeley.CA.US (Matthew Dillon)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc
- Subject: Re: NT: please define vapor.
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <dillon.0nkv@overload.Berkeley.CA.US>
- References: <1992Sep09.164238.2487@microsoft.com> <jbone.716138069@splat>
- Date: 11 Sep 92 09:52:26 PST
- Organization: Not an Organization
- Lines: 22
-
- >In article <jbone.716138069@splat> jbone@splat.dell.com (Jeff Bone) writes:
- >
- >That about sums up vapor as far as I'm concerned. This product,
- >which has no end users at all, has somehow created what basically
- >amounts to market hysteria. Sanity check! As of today, 9/10/92,
- >NT has 0, that's *0* end users. I'd call that vapor.
- >
- >Standard dissing, standard disclaimers. ;)
-
- NT isn't vapor, it's silly to argue that it is. It isn't going to be
- much better then 3.1 though from the users standpoint.
-
-
- -Matt
-
- --
-
- Matthew Dillon dillon@Overload.Berkeley.CA.US
- 891 Regal Rd. uunet.uu.net!overload!dillon
- Berkeley, Ca. 94708 ham: KC6LVW (no mail drop)
- USA Sandel-Avery Engineering (702)831-8000
-
-