home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #20 / NN_1992_20.iso / spool / comp / sys / ibm / pc / misc / 12342 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-09-08  |  951 b 
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!uniwa.uwa.edu.au!uniwa.uwa.edu.au!nfm
  2. From: gude@uniwa.uwa.edu.au (David J W Emrich)
  3. Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
  4. Subject: Re: Borland C++ vs Turbo C++
  5. Date: 7 Sep 1992 22:56:48 +0800
  6. Organization: The University of Westrn Australia
  7. Lines: 21
  8. Message-ID: <18fqjgINNaio@uniwa.uwa.edu.au>
  9. NNTP-Posting-Host: uniwa.uwa.edu.au
  10.  
  11. tklancar@galaxy.gov.bc.ca writes:
  12.  
  13. >In article <1992Sep6.184924.3701@cc.umontreal.ca>, rahmanqi@ERE.UMontreal.CA (Rahman Qazi Ibadur) writes:
  14. >> Hello,
  15. >> 
  16. >>   I am thinking of buying TC++ or BC++. Can anyone tell me the diffrence between these two borland products.
  17. >> 
  18. >> Thanks
  19. >> 
  20. >> rahmanqi@brise.ERE.UMontreal.ca
  21.  
  22.  
  23. >I believe that Borland C++ includes the ability to create Windows programs,
  24. >whereas Turbo C++ does not.
  25.  
  26. I'm getting confused, Borland writes all the Turbo products, so isn't
  27. Turbo C++ the same thing as Borland C++?
  28.  
  29. [dav]    aka
  30. David Emrich
  31. gude@uniwa.uwa.edu.au
  32.