home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #20 / NN_1992_20.iso / spool / comp / sys / ibm / pc / misc / 12341 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-09-08  |  1.0 KB  |  32 lines
  1. Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!usc!rpi!newsserver.pixel.kodak.com!laidbak!tellab5!ruth.wheaton.edu!gmribeir
  3. From: gmribeir@david.wheaton.edu (Glauber)
  4. Subject: Re: Borland C++ vs Turbo C++
  5. Message-ID: <1992Sep7.145202.2112@wheaton.wheaton.edu>
  6. Sender: news@wheaton.wheaton.edu (USENET News System)
  7. Organization: (n.) Body of persons united for a specific purpose.
  8. References: <1992Sep6.184924.3701@cc.umontreal.ca>
  9. Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1992 14:52:02 GMT
  10. Lines: 20
  11.  
  12. In article <1992Sep6.184924.3701@cc.umontreal.ca> rahmanqi@ERE.UMontreal.CA (Rahman Qazi Ibadur) writes:
  13. >Hello,
  14. >
  15. >  I am thinking of buying TC++ or BC++. Can anyone tell me the diffrence between these two borland products.
  16. >
  17. >Thanks
  18. >
  19. >rahmanqi@brise.ERE.UMontreal.ca
  20.  
  21. I think it is mostly price. BorlandC is supposed to be the
  22. "professional" compiler, while TurboC is the entry level.
  23.  
  24. If i am wrong, i'd like to be corrected.
  25.  
  26.                         Glauber
  27.  
  28. -- 
  29. Glauber Ribeiro - Wheaton College, IL  (USA)
  30.                   glauber@david.wheaton.edu 
  31.                   glauber@vpnet.chi.il.us
  32.