home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!ukma!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!ucbvax!NEMOMUS.BITNET!A379
- From: A379@NEMOMUS.BITNET (Mark Johnson)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.modula2
- Subject: Modula-2: Is a standard needed?
- Message-ID: <08SEP92.23550518.0071.MUSIC@NEMOMUS>
- Date: 9 Sep 92 01:48:21 GMT
- Sender: usenet@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
- Reply-To: Modula2 List <INFO-M2%UCF1VM.BITNET@cmsa.Berkeley.EDU>
- Organization: The Internet
- Lines: 13
-
- > YES!
- >
- > Is the current standard the answer? I don't know.
- >
- > Having to deal with several versions of Modula-2 compilers on different
- > systems and trying to maintain code that will compile with any of them
- > is a real pain. PIM is NOT enough.
-
- People have said that they could write portable code with PIM.
- I'd like to hear how, in particular, how do you deal with
- I/O?
-
- Mark Johnson a379@academic.nemostate.edu
-