home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!sun4nl!tuegate.tue.nl!rw7.urc.tue.nl!wsadjw
- From: wsadjw@rw7.urc.tue.nl (Jan Willem Nienhuys)
- Newsgroups: sci.math
- Subject: Re: Is Card(R)=Card(R^2)?
- Message-ID: <5043@tuegate.tue.nl>
- Date: 13 Aug 92 13:26:23 GMT
- References: <1992Aug12.102140.5231@nntp.hut.fi> <1992Aug13.000928.12631@unidus.rz.uni-duesseldorf.de> <1992Aug13.011522.11161@informix.com>
- Sender: root@tuegate.tue.nl
- Reply-To: wsadjw@urc.tue.nl
- Organization: Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands
- Lines: 40
-
- In article <1992Aug13.011522.11161@informix.com> proberts@informix.com (Paul Roberts) writes:
- >>
- >>Such mappings exist! To construct a mapping f(x,y) = z choose a
- >>unique decimal representation of x and y and then merge the digits.
- >>
- >>i.E.:
- >>x = 1 0 0 2. 7 1 8 2 8 2 . . . . . .
- >>y = 3 0 3 .1 4 1 5 9 3 . . . . . .
- >>
- >>z = 1300032.174118529832............
- >>
- >>This will be bijective for non-negative real numbers. In order to obtain a
- >>bijective mapping R <-> R^2 this has to be combined with a bijection
- >>which maps real numbers to non-negative real numbers (right now, I
- >>don't remeber by heart how this is done, but it is possible).
- >
- >I believe that there is even an everywhere-continuous
- >bijective mapping from the unit line to the unit square.
-
- Two remarks. The first mapping was thought up by Cantor, but it is
- wrong, because some numbers have two representations.
- Trick: exclude representations that end in an infinite sequence of
- zeros. Chop these in pieces not of a single digit, but of a sequence
- of zeros (possibly of length 0) followed by a single non-zero.
- Then mix these.
-
- Second remark. A continuous bijective map from a compact set onto
- a compact set has a continuous inverse, i.e. a homeomorphism. The
- unit interval is not homeomorphic to the unit square.
-
- Peano constructed a continuous map from the unit interval onto the
- unit square (a fractal of dimension 2 actually). But it is not injective,
- it has many double points. At that time people were indeed worried that
- such a map (and then bicontinuous) might be found. It would destroy
- the idea of dimension. But L.E.J. Brouwer proved around 1910 that
- dimension is invariant under homeomorphism, so dimension is a topological
- concept.
-
- JWN
-
-