home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #18 / NN_1992_18.iso / spool / comp / os / os2 / misc / 27324 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-08-13  |  917 b 
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!agate!shyguy
  2. From: shyguy@ocf.berkeley.edu (David S. Shy)
  3. Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
  4. Subject: Re: Win NT support in OS/2
  5. Date: 13 Aug 1992 20:43:17 GMT
  6. Organization: U.C. Berkeley Open Computing Facility
  7. Lines: 15
  8. Message-ID: <16ehh5INN9hr@agate.berkeley.edu>
  9. References: <1992Aug12.171206.305@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
  10. NNTP-Posting-Host: sandstorm.berkeley.edu
  11.  
  12. >current licensing agreement.  So can we expect Windows NT
  13. >support in OS/2 3.0, when it becomes available next year?
  14. >Obviously, it will require a 486 instead of a 386 and will
  15.                               ^^^
  16.  
  17. ??? why would it REQUIRE a 486?  Isn't the 486 just a spiffy
  18. version of the 386?  (w/ the addition of math co-processor,
  19. 8k cache, and some other minor speed-adding design)
  20. Is a 486 required purely because a 386 would be too slow or
  21. does NT require a math co-processor?
  22.  
  23. david shy
  24. shyguy@ocf.berkeley.edu
  25.  
  26.  
  27.