home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #18 / NN_1992_18.iso / spool / comp / os / linux / 8450 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-08-17  |  1.1 KB  |  27 lines
  1. Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!rpi!maniattb
  3. From: maniattb@cs.rpi.edu (Bill Maniatty)
  4. Subject: Re: shared libs - can everyone be happy with this?
  5. Message-ID: <d-dyhz_@rpi.edu>
  6. Nntp-Posting-Host: fornax.cs.rpi.edu
  7. References: <1992Aug14.145754.29366@crd.ge.com> <1992Aug15.042420.18914@serval.net.wsu.edu> <NOP.92Aug16220027@theory.Mankato.MSUS.EDU> <1992Aug17.065450.28834@colorado.edu>
  8. Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1992 14:42:07 GMT
  9. Lines: 16
  10.  
  11. In article <1992Aug17.065450.28834@colorado.edu>, drew@ophelia.cs.colorado.edu (Drew Eckhardt) writes:
  12. |> In article <NOP.92Aug16220027@theory.Mankato.MSUS.EDU> nop@theory.Mankato.MSUS.EDU (Jay A. Carlson) writes:
  13. |> >In article <1992Aug15.042420.18914@serval.net.wsu.edu> hlu@phys1.physics.wsu.edu (Hongjiu Lu) writes:
  14.     [Stuff Deleted] 
  15. |> Also, if we ever unbreak Linux, writing to code space should trigger
  16. |> a segmentation fault - it's like it is now because the estdio library 
  17. |> was broken, and wrote to the code. 
  18.     Does linux permit self modifying code (by design or bug)?
  19.     This seems like a pretty bad ``feature''.
  20.  
  21. Bill
  22.  
  23. -- 
  24. |
  25. |    maniattb@cs.rpi.edu - in real life Bill Maniatty
  26. |
  27.