home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!waikato.ac.nz!canterbury.ac.nz!betelgeux!tomlin
- Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
- Subject: Re: Problems compiling Elm and mail
- Message-ID: <1992Aug17.095703.360@csc.canterbury.ac.nz>
- From: tomlin@elec.canterbury.ac.nz (Mark Tomlinson)
- Date: 17 Aug 92 09:57:02 +1200
- References: <713509574snx@grendel.demon.co.uk>
- Distribution: world
- Organization: Electrical Engineering, University of Canterbury, New Zealand
- Nntp-Posting-Host: elec.canterbury.ac.nz
- X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5
- Lines: 13
-
- Jim Segrave (jes@grendel.demon.co.uk) wrote:
- : - more at the original authors for
- : such sloppy coding practices. I'd had a long day dealing with just these
- : problems in another large chunk of code.
-
- You too huh? I just spent quite a while searching through the source for the
- reason that mail was not resolving @ addresses. I found that the search of
- the 'paths' file just didn't work. Has anyone else made alterations to the
- mail in mailpak1.2? What I've got now does work, but the code is messy. It
- looks like there have been changes made by various people at various times,
- all contributing to a very messy piece of code.
-
- - Mark Tomlinso
-