home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.comp.acad-freedom.talk:2558 alt.censorship:6924
- Path: sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!mips!sdd.hp.com!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!m.cs.uiuc.edu!herodotus.cs.uiuc.edu!kadie
- From: kadie@herodotus.cs.uiuc.edu (Carl M. Kadie)
- Newsgroups: alt.comp.acad-freedom.talk,alt.censorship
- Subject: WLU (in Canada) bans alt.sex* because its "offensive"
- Message-ID: <1992Aug13.181732.3739@m.cs.uiuc.edu>
- Date: 13 Aug 92 18:17:32 GMT
- Sender: news@m.cs.uiuc.edu (News Database (admin-Mike Schwager))
- Organization: University of Illinois, Dept. of Comp. Sci., Urbana, IL
- Lines: 140
-
- [This article, by Jim Boyce, jboyce1@mamut.wlu.ca, appeared on July
- 14th in the Wilfrid Laurier University's student newspaper, the Cord.
- Since the first article was published no action has been taken by the
- administration except the electing of a new chair for the senate
- committee of computing. It is posted with Jim Boyce's permission.]
-
- Access to six newsgroups on Laurier's computing system has
- been restricted until the Senate Committee on Computing Ethics
- can meet and discuss their controversial content. All six were
- from the alt.sex hierarchy, a collection of groups that deals
- with topics ranging from bondage and bestiality to recovery from
- sexual abuse and a general discussion on sex. WLU President John
- Weir said he made the decision because, "in my opinion, and in
- the opinions of others, the material was offensive."
- Newsgroups first began arriving at Laurier two months ago
- when the university started to switch from the "unix" computer
- system to the faster, "sequent" system. They enter through a
- computer network called ONET via the University of Waterloo, and
- include messages and information from computer users all over the
- world.
- While there are more than a thousand newsgroups available,
- it is a handful which are raising moral and legal questions at
- several Canadian universities. Most of these are in the alt.sex
- hierarchy which are among the most popular newsgroups.
- In May, the alt.sex hierarchy and several other groups were
- banned at the University of Manitoba after a student sent some
- prinouts from alt.sex to a reporter at The Winnipeg Free Press.
- Gerry Miller, Director of Computing at the University of
- Manitoba, said the Winnipeg vice squad visited the univeristy
- twice asking for technical information on newsgroups. The ban is
- still in effect, Miller said, although individual users may get
- access, "if anybody can make a case that the material should be
- brought back for scholary issues."
- On July 2, The Kitchener-Waterloo Record ran a front page
- story about computer pornography at the University of Waterloo.
- It was reported that the newspaper had received newsgroup stories
- and pictures anonymously, including, "a photograph of an almost
- nude woman hanging by her neck from a rope on a hook. Her mouth
- is open as if screaming." The Waterloo Regional Police Department
- was quoted as saying no investigation would be undertaken unless
- campus police requested help. The University of Waterloo, which
- banned the alt.sex hierarchy for several months in 1990, plans no
- investigation either unless a complaint about the material is
- received.
- Other universities to recently deal with the matter include
- University of Ottawa, University of Toronto and Simon Fraser.
- The Cord began an investigation on newsgroups in May after
- being informed by Ruby Ramji, a Laurier student, that many of
- them were unavailable at Laurier. Ramji said she had found a
- newslist on the Laurier system and tried to access some of the
- groups that were listed on it but was unable to get most of the
- "alt" groups, including the entire alt.sex hierarchy.
- Ramji then talked to Bob Ellsworth, Assistant Systems
- Administrator, about the problem and said she was told that no
- restrictions had been placed on the groups. She decided to pursue
- the matter further. "Since Bob said it was happening outside the
- university, I decided to follow the link."
- Because the newsgroups come to Laurier via the University of
- Waterloo, Ramji used a friend's account there to see if U of W
- was restricting "alt" groups and indirectly keeping them out of
- Laurier. She said she checked the U of W system about eight times
- during May and found that the "alt" groups were always available.
- On June 17, the Cord interviewed Ellsworth and Carl
- Langford, Systems Administrator. Two reasons were offered to
- explain the absence of the alt.sex newgroups.
- First, there was an expiry date of one day for messages in
- the "alt" groups. Even with such an expiry date, however, there
- should have been dozens of messages a day at Laurier just as
- there were at the University of Waterloo. Instead, there were
- only one or two and they arrived indirectly via other newsgroups.
- Secondly, system problems may have been keeping the groups
- out. Whatever the reason, Langford said that it was
- unintentional: "We have done nothing here to stop if from coming
- in."
- A week later, the Cord interviewed Langford, Ellsworth and
- Hart Bezner, Director of Computing Services. Bezner said he was
- "stunned by even the suggestion that people would be keeping it
- [alt.sex] out", and attributed the unavailablility of alt.sex to
- problems within the system.
- Bezner typified the content of alt.sex as "puerile" and said
- that he could not understand why students would be interested in
- reading "bondage" groups. He added that the situation would have
- to be considered in regards to the university switching over to
- the new computer system: "It's a matter of priorities, putting
- sex groups on is not as important as compilers... it's just like
- walking up to a half-finished apartment and asking why the
- bathroom isn't finished... we just haven't got around to it yet."
- Later, Bezner said the Cord interview "turned on our
- interest" and he decided to do something about the material in
- the alt.sex groups. He took one hundred pages of output from one
- of the groups to Don Baker, Vice-President Academic: "it was my
- personal decision... I looked at it and said to myself, `I don't
- want to be held legally responsible for that, let those guys [the
- administration] investigate the legalities of it'."
- Langford said that many of the people in Computing Services
- had moral and legal concerns about the material and had talked
- about it amongst themselves: "We're a small enough group that we
- can discuss these things."
- A meeting was held shortly after and attended by Baker,
- Langford, WLU President John Weir, and Arthur Stephens and Julia
- Easley of Institutional Relations. The printout was discussed at
- the meeting and John Weir made known his decision to restrict the
- six newsgroups.
- On June 26, one of the newsgroups was restricted, and on
- July 2, another five met a similar fate. All six were from the
- alt.sex hierarchy, according to Ramji (Bezner referred us to her
- because he was not sure which of the groups were restricted).
- They included: alt.sex.bondage, bestiality, motss (members of the
- same sex), movies, pictures.d (a subgroup that discusses
- pictures), pictures.misc, and wizards (a less tame version of the
- generic alt.sex group).
- Don Baker said that the solution was "short term". He said
- that there were policies on language use at Laurier and laws on
- such issues as hate literature, and that while the university
- should try to be as liberal as possible, "we're mindful of the
- fact that language has consequences, and to the extent that they
- can be discriminatory or demeaning, we should have some concern."
- John Weir said that the decision was based on how offensive
- the material was and not any legal implications. He did not think
- the decision compromised the university in any way and said, "I
- think one has to always make judgement about the need to judge
- things as being offensive versus the right people claim to have
- to read anything they want to read... we could have, I suppose,
- allowed the thing to run and gave it to the committee as a
- problem such as that. We chose not to do that. We felt that we
- would prefer to have it off-line during the interim rather than
- on-line."
- Ruby Ramji disagrees with the judgement and, until the
- Senate Committee makes a decision, will have to access alt.sex at
- the University of Waterloo. She said that the newsgroups have
- educational content and discuss issues such as sexual hangups and
- relationships, and provide information on AIDS and other sexual
- diseases. They also have an academic purpose: "I was doing a
- study on alt.sex and I couldn't get access to it and I needed it
- as a primary source... I feel they [the administration] are
- hindering the flow of information into an academic institution
- that's supposed to uphold the freedom of information."
-
- --
- Carl Kadie -- kadie@cs.uiuc.edu -- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
-