home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: uk.telecom
- From: dec@alex.com (Doug Clinton)
- Return-Path: <news>
- Path: sparky!uunet!pipex!demon!alex.com!dec
- Subject: Re: Itemised Bills
- Nntp-Posting-Host: woody
- Organization: Alex Technologies Ltd
- References: <931325141322@ibm3090.bham.ac.uk> <1993Jan25.144543.5802@alex.com> <C1FF16.G18@exnet.co.uk>
- Apparently-To: mail2news@demon.co.uk
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 10:20:00 +0000
- Message-ID: <1993Jan26.102000.11042@alex.com>
- Sender: usenet@demon.co.uk
- Lines: 24
-
- In article <C1FF16.G18@exnet.co.uk>, dhd@exnet.co.uk (Damon) writes:
- |> In article <1993Jan25.144543.5802@alex.com> dec@alex.com (Doug Clinton) writes:
- |> >(probably one or two orders of magnitude) which means they do not have
- |> >to store as much data.
- |>
- |> BT is reputed to keep details of all calls on fast storage for six
- |> months for dubious purposes; I'm sure Mr Parnoid^H^H^H^H^H^H^H Toal
- |> (B^>) will provide some illumination here...
-
- In that case the reason I had always assumed for not being able to get
- a fully itemised bill is wrong and I can only assume that BT simply do
- not want to offer their customers a service (surprise, surprise).
-
- Regards,
- Doug
-
- --
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
- Doug Clinton Alex Technologies Ltd
- dec@alex.com CP House,
- 97-107 Uxbridge Road,
- +44 (0)81 566 2307 Ealing, London, W5 5TL
- === PGP 2.1 public key available ===
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
-