home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: uk.telecom
- From: dec@alex.com (Doug Clinton)
- Return-Path: <news@alex.com>
- Path: sparky!uunet!pipex!demon!alex.com!dec
- Subject: Re: Call charges
- Nntp-Posting-Host: woody
- Organization: Alex Technologies Ltd
- References: <934125174103@ibm3090.bham.ac.uk>
- Apparently-To: mail2news@demon.co.uk
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1993 10:22:53 +0000
- Message-ID: <1993Jan26.102253.11315@alex.com>
- Sender: usenet@demon.co.uk
- Lines: 26
-
- In article <934125174103@ibm3090.bham.ac.uk>, TREHARAJ@ibm3090.bham.ac.uk writes:
- |> ==============================================================================
- |> Doug Clinton writes:
- |>
- |> If they _do_ take this into account when calculating their unit
- |> costs, they must estimate the amount they make from these part units
- |> and adjust the unit costs accordingly. It's a pretty dodgy way of
- |> pricing services whatever they are doing, the fact they tell you how
- |> their dodgy system works doesn't mean they are not overcharging.
- |>
-
- I never said it was a good charging system and I beleive it is
- overpriced but my definition of 'overcharging' is charging more that
- you said you would. Of course, BT don't go out of their way to
- advertise this charging structure but they do publish it.
-
- Doug
-
- --
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
- Doug Clinton Alex Technologies Ltd
- dec@alex.com CP House,
- 97-107 Uxbridge Road,
- +44 (0)81 566 2307 Ealing, London, W5 5TL
- === PGP 2.1 public key available ===
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
-