home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!morrow.stanford.edu!morrow.stanford.edu!not-for-mail
- From: GE.DWS@forsythe.stanford.edu (Drew W. Saunders)
- Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
- Subject: Re: The Future of the Bike
- Date: 22 Jan 1993 14:11:44 -0800
- Organization: Stanford University
- Lines: 29
- Sender: news@morrow.stanford.edu
- Distribution: usa
- Message-ID: <1jprf0INNia3@morrow.stanford.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: morrow.stanford.edu
-
- In article <1460067@hplred.HPL.HP.COM>,
- jbrandt@hplred.HPL.HP.COM (Jobst Brandt) writes:
- >Dave Rogers writes:
- >
- >> Some Harley-Davidson motorcycles have had a cogged Kevlar drive
- >> belt. Supposedly with much better reliability than chains and no
- >> chain lube required.
- >
- >A Harley Davidson does not have nearly the torque of a bicycle rider
- > [etc...]
- >I don't see the belt coming to bicycling, at least not for high
- >performance bicycles.
-
- That's where I see the future of cycling, or rather where I'd like
- to see the future of cycling, in non-high performance bicycles.
- Many people who currently like to commute short distances by bike
- either don't want to or don't know how to maintain their bicycles.
- A belt drive would reduce maintenance needs for a low-torque
- commuter bike quite nicely, especially if paired with 5-spd hub.
- Put the brakes in the hubs and it stops nearly as well (or as
- poorly) in the rain as in dry, with even less maintenance. The
- problem with many 3-spd and 5-spd commute bikes, current and old,
- is that the frames are massively over-built lumps of lead. A
- lighter weight frame would work just as well for most commute needs,
- which tend to put little stress on the frame, even with groceries in
- the panniers. Add these new, lightweight, solid tires from the UK,
- and it'll be virtually maintenance free.
-
- Drew
-