home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.isdn
- Path: sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!bgsuvax!att!cbnewsc!cbfsb!cbnewsf.cb.att.com!deej
- From: deej@cbnewsf.cb.att.com (david.g.lewis)
- Subject: Re: BONDING and T1 Letter Ballot 317
- Message-ID: <1993Jan22.140154.15053@cbfsb.cb.att.com>
- Sender: news@cbfsb.cb.att.com
- Organization: AT&T
- References: <1993Jan19.135401.21097@cbfsb.cb.att.com> <1993Jan20.132319.10075W@lumina.edb.tih.no> <bob1.727625771@cos>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 14:01:54 GMT
- Lines: 14
-
- In article <bob1.727625771@cos> bob1@cos.com (Bob Blackshaw) writes:
- >In <1993Jan20.132319.10075W@lumina.edb.tih.no> ketil@edb.tih.no (Ketil Albertsen,TIH) writes:
- >
- >Also, this thread seems to have overlooked the H10 rate here in NA.
- >H10 allows use of 22 channels just in case you only have a single
- >PRI. If you used H11 on a single PRI you would kill your D-channel
- >and would then be in a bit of trouble.
-
- H10 is 23*B (1472kb/s), not 22; additionally, in the current draft addendum
- to T1.607 (American Standard for ISDN access signaling - Q.931 equivalent)
- the H10 codepoint is deleted.
-
- David G Lewis AT&T Bell Laboratories
- david.g.lewis@att.com or !att!goofy!deej Switching & ISDN Implementation
-