home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.ai.philosophy:7378 sci.philosophy.tech:4942
- Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy,sci.philosophy.tech
- Path: sparky!uunet!portal!emil
- From: emil@shell.portal.com (emil rojas)
- Subject: Re: Searle on animal consciousness
- Message-ID: <C1Dzy0.H9D@unix.portal.com>
- Sender: news@unix.portal.com
- Nntp-Posting-Host: jobe
- Organization: Portal Communications Company
- References: <1993Jan24.024230.5977@sophia.smith.edu> <1juactINN4ph@cannelloni.cis.ohio-state.edu> <1993Jan24.213358.10067@sophia.smith.edu> <1jvevlINN4va@cannelloni.cis.ohio-state.edu>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 01:53:59 GMT
- Lines: 38
-
- chandra@cis.ohio-state.edu (B Chandrasekaran) writes:
-
- >In article <1993Jan24.213358.10067@sophia.smith.edu> orourke@sophia.smith.edu (Joseph O'Rourke) writes:
- >That is a different question. You are no longer asking if dogs are
- >conscious, but about the complexity of and variety of the objects of
- >their consciousness (and the expressiveness of th language in which
- >these objects are represented). I haven't read Searles' book, but
- >from what you said about it it seems that all he is saying is that
- >dogs are conscious.
-
- Does conscious here mean self-aware?
-
-
- >BTW, having beliefs (or behaving such that beliefs are attributable to
- >one) is not sufficient for consciousness. One can behave as if one
- >believes A without being aware that one believes A. Often,
- >psychoanalysis brings out hidden fears and beliefs that control our
- >actions, but we are not aware of them. Of course we are often aware
- >of desires and beliefs as well, but that doesn't seem to a defining
- >characteristic of consciousness. The content of consciousness in
- >humans is much more expressive of course, which certainly gives human
- >consciousness a qualitative difference.
-
- I take issue with the idea that this "gives human consciousness a
- qualitative difference." Unless of course, you believe an elephant's
- strength is _qualitatively_ greater than your own.
-
- >But having goals (which is
- >the same as desires, I think) and knowledge (or beliefs) is orthogonal
- >to being conscious, I think.
-
- Just to be picky. Conscious and _knowledge_ of self/other would seem
- to me to be related, that is not orthogonal.
- --
- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
- Emil Rojas emil@shell.portal.com (408) 973-0603
- Cognisys Software System Development
- +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
-