home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!tabatha!maf
- From: maf@tabatha.MAE.CWRU.Edu (Mark Fullmer)
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.banyan-l
- Subject: Re: Two servers on the same ethe
- Date: 26 Jan 1993 00:39:14 GMT
- Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Lines: 34
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <1k217jINNpmb@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>
- References: <23011915154602@vms3.macc.wisc.edu> <1ji5qrINN13l@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> <1993Jan25.190231.13072@netcom.com>
- Reply-To: maf+@osu.edu
- NNTP-Posting-Host: tabatha.mae.cwru.edu
-
- In article <1993Jan25.190231.13072@netcom.com>, moses@netcom.com (Lamont Cranston) writes:
- |> >On a campus Lan, where multiple buildings and multiple administrators share
- |> >the same ethernet, the solution is probably a filtering bridge.
- |>
- |> Mark, Jergen:
-
- Close :)
-
- |> Novell, no routing server. Login, random unless you hard code it (a
- |> real pain for lab machines servicing people on several servers).
-
- I wasn't trying to compare network os's, just give an example that other
- systems have the same problem as Vines.
-
- As for no routing server, why should office A route packets for office B
- just because they're both on the same ethernet.....
-
- |> Again, I must disagree. Vines isn't the "worst" as far as multiple
- |> servers go, it's the best. The problems you stated in AppleTalk and
-
- Yes, I don't disagree. Vines does provide the best (pc / mac)
- connectivity. You took my statement out of context though -- Appleshare
- servers and Novell servers can coexist on the same ethernet without problems
- if precautions are taken. Vines can't without paying for the server to
- server LAN option.
-
- |> --
- |> Lamont Cranston "I once had a plan, but it seems to
- |> moses@netcom.com to have gone missing"
-
- --
- mark
- maf+@osu.edu
-
-