home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
- Path: sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!howland.reston.ans.net!spool.mu.edu!yale.edu!newsserver.jvnc.net!princeton!crux!roger
- From: roger@crux.Princeton.EDU (Roger Lustig)
- Subject: Re: Will vs. Shall
- Message-ID: <1993Jan24.054010.23880@Princeton.EDU>
- Originator: news@nimaster
- Sender: news@Princeton.EDU (USENET News System)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: crux.princeton.edu
- Reply-To: roger@astro.princeton.edu (Roger Lustig)
- Organization: Princeton University
- References: <1js1usINNskg@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> <1993Jan23.190644.10119@midway.uchicago.edu>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 05:40:10 GMT
- Lines: 25
-
- In article <1993Jan23.190644.10119@midway.uchicago.edu> djb6@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
- >Questions about the use of the verb "will" vs. the verb "shall"
-
- >- What's the difference? Many people in America apparently don't
- >know and use "will" in all cases. My intuitive guess was that
- >"shall" was subjunctive. Lately I've been told that they are the
- >same verb, except that "shall" is used for the first person and
- >"will" in other cases. This sounds correct to me. Is it true?
-
- In England, more or less. In America, no, not really. Some people
- insist on such a standard; but it's not standard American usage.
- You might want to check the Usage Note in the AHD3, which points out
- that getting *all* of the complicated English pattern of shalls and
- wills right is something that few Americans ever succeed in doing,
- and that the distinction you mention above tends to sound mannered.
- "Shall" is generally reserved for interrogatives (Shall we dance?)
- and a few other things in this country.
-
- >-Can the abbreviation apostrophe l l ('ll) be used to abbreviate
- >both "will" and "shall," or just "will"?
-
- Sure. We'll overcome someday...8-)
-
- Roger
-
-