home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.fan.tolkien
- Path: sparky!uunet!psgrain!neon!pail!bucket!samw
- From: samw@bucket.rain.com (Sam Warden)
- Subject: Re: shape of Ea before end of second era ?
- Message-ID: <samw.727646292@bucket>
- Sender: usenet@pail.rain.com (USENET News)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: bucket.rain.com
- Organization: Rick's Home-Grown Un*x
- References: <C0qGvC.1MK@sci.kun.nl> <93012.151623JXD132@psuvm.psu.edu> <samw.727038788@bucket> <1993Jan18.212231.3242@netlabs.com>
- Date: 21 Jan 93 19:58:12 GMT
- Lines: 29
-
- lwall@netlabs.com (Larry Wall) writes:
-
- >: As a physicist by training that's the one thing in all this
- >: that I find at all `disturbing'.... [earth originally `flat']
-
- >Why is it most physicists like the idea of multiple futures diverging
- >so much more than the idea of multiple pasts converging? :-)
-
- I haven't the vaguest. :-) I wasn't aware that I was implying
- that. It's just that we rather like them all to be, well,
- physically consistent. :-)
-
- Don't get me wrong, I _have_ thought of Tolkien's account in terms
- of dimensional transformations in which the world originally
- would _appear_ flat from inside. This would be consistent with
- the idea that the removal of Valinor was by other than ordinary
- physical means within 3-dimensional space, which I think is
- strongly implied in several places relating to its existence
- afterward. But I don't like to rely on this sort of `angel-
- on-a-pin' reasoning from what are after all nonphysical
- premises. :-) I don't think Tolkien was trying to be
- consistent with physical science as much as with existing
- myth, including the Biblical one.
-
-
- --
-
- samw@bucket.rain.com (Sam Warden) -- and not a mere Device.
-
-