home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!Germany.EU.net!news.netmbx.de!mailgzrz.TU-Berlin.DE!math.fu-berlin.de!ira.uka.de!yale.edu!spool.mu.edu!agate!ames!decwrl!access.usask.ca!skyfox!meagher
- From: meagher@skyfox
- Newsgroups: alt.consciousness
- Subject: RE: Science Superior to Mysticism
- Date: 24 JAN 93 17:43:30 GMT
- Organization: University of Saskatchewan
- Lines: 24
- Message-ID: <24JAN93.17433003@skyfox>
- References: <1993Jan20.230740.2061@gnv.ifas.ufl.edu> <1993Jan22.030609.9070@ucc.su.OZ.AU>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: sask.usask.ca
-
- In a previous article, hughg@brutus.ee.su.oz.au (Hugh Garsden) wrote:
- >
- >Science is not a religion. It is a method created by human beings to find
- >things out, as best as one can. It can be applied to anything.
- >
-
- The idea that science can be applied to anything is, I believe, false.
- The idea that science can be applied to anything is precisely what we
- use the term "scientism" to denote. While we might "apply" science to
- anything, the real point at issue here is how "successful" such an
- approach is relative to other approaches to the same subject matter.
- Success must defined in terms of the degree of understanding we obtain as
- a result of using method x relative to method y. Now I think that there
- are a number of domains that use methods other than science successfully:
- historical methods in sociology, ethnographic methods in anthropology,
- qualitative methods in clinical psychology, etc...
- In making this comment I don't want to belittle science in
- any way. "Scientism" on the other hand...
-
- Paul D. Meagher
- Dept. of Psychology
- Univ. of Saskatchewan
- meagher@sask.usask.ca
-
-