home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.amateur-comp:663 comp.edu:2373 soc.culture.usa:10100 alt.activism:21362
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!ronda
- From: ronda@ais.org (Ronda Hauben)
- Newsgroups: alt.amateur-comp,comp.edu,soc.culture.usa,alt.activism
- Subject: Re: Email sent to Congress - then stopped (Was Re: Internet Access...)
- Date: 26 Jan 1993 03:48:52 GMT
- Organization: UMCC
- Lines: 89
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <1k2cb4INNhgf@srvr1.engin.umich.edu>
- References: <1jslhnINNncl@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: umcc.ais.org
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
-
- ronda@ais.org responding:
-
- Robert Kastigar (urkastig@uxa.ecn.bgu.edu) wrote:
- : OK, at the suggestion or urging of Ronda and the rest of you
-
- Bob, I want to be clear that I didn't urge you to write the
- letter you wrote.
-
- I do agree that we should have email access to Congress,
- but I don't agree that Congress is denying us this access
- because of some computer illiteracy on their part.
-
- Rather, they are constituent illiterate - i.e. they have
- no respect for the experiences and wishes of their
- constituents - they have taken their offices as license
- for privilege and for serving those who pay them well in
- exchange.
-
- They want and have had a network for their own purposes -
- and have no desire to hear from their constituents.
-
- In their actions on this issue they behave much as the
- former Party officials in the former Soviet Union.
-
- Thus it would seem that the fate of the former might
- be a lesson to our similar officials - but it doesn't
- seem that is the case.
-
- Instead it seems that they believe they can continue
- to ignore the people they are supposed to represent,
- even as Clinton recently said - telling us to
- sacrifice so they can continue their Party at our
- expense.
-
- Also, the Gore bill it seems is intended to provide
- a network for the commercial world at our expense -
-
- There seems no respect for the importance of the
- interactive communication that Usenet News has
- made possible among either the supposed elected
- representatives or those pushing for commercial
- and private take overs of the fruits of
- millions of dollars of our taxes in research on
- the Arpanet, NSFNet and now Internet.
-
- Thus it seems that the deliberate exclusion of us
- from access to Congress via electronic mail is
- similar to the deliberate efforts to take away
- the ability of the commonfolk to publicly comment
- on affairs that affect them which the nets
- make possible and instead to substitute some
- fancy video, sound, barrage to sell us a new
- brand of commercials.
-
- Also, the lack of information to the public of
- the many millions of dollars of public
- investment in these networks is very serious.
- Thus there now seems an effort to claim that
- industry needs a deserved return on its
- investment and thus the networks are to
- be handed over to private or commercial
- parties - rather than the real truth that
- the public funds invested means that this
- technology belongs to the public and should
- not be taken away from the public.
-
- : on the net, I sent the following letters today to my two
- : Senators and my representative in the house.
- :
- : May I suggest you do the same, or something similar?
- : -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
- :
- : The Honorable Senator Carol Mosley-Braun
- : United State Senate
- : Washington, DC 20510
- :
- : Dear Senator:
- :
- : Computers are very much in use today and growing common. Within
- : this community there is growing concern or interest in access to
- : information and ideas from the Federal Government, and from our
- : elected government officials. I've enclosed a copy of an article
-
-
- Bob, I disagree - We have enough of hearing what Congress has
- to say to us. For a change they need to hear what we have to
- say to them. This is the "tail wagging the dog," as UAW pioneers
- wrote when they complained about not being allowed to
- criticize UAW union officials.
-