home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!wri!joplin.wri.com!markp
- From: markp@joplin.wri.com (Mark Pundurs)
- Subject: Re: Who are you guys?
- Message-ID: <markp.726853299@joplin.wri.com>
- Sender: news@wri.com
- Nntp-Posting-Host: joplin.wri.com
- Organization: Wolfram Research, Inc.
- References: <markp.726777200@joplin.wri.com> <29563@oasys.dt.navy.mil> <markp.726793936@joplin.wri.com> <1993Jan12.022734.2897@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1993 15:41:39 GMT
- Lines: 22
-
- In <1993Jan12.022734.2897@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> mcochran@nyx.cs.du.edu (Mark A. Cochran) writes:
-
- >In article <markp.726793936@joplin.wri.com> markp@joplin.wri.com (Mark Pundurs) writes:
-
- >[Deletia]
-
- >>The word "possibility" is crucial here:
- >>Sex = possibility of pregnancy; so
- >>Consent to sex = Consent to possibility of pregnancy.
- >>
- >Ho hum, I guess it's another week, and time to point this out again...
-
- Again?
-
- >Consent to possibility of pregnancy != consent to remain pregnant.
-
- You're half-right; at this point, it's vital (no pun intended) to
- ask whether the z/e/f has the right to life. New thread, anyone?
-
- > Mark Cochran merlin@eddie.ee.vt.edu
-
- Mark Pundurs
-