home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!gatech!concert!rock!taco!csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu!dsholtsi
- From: dsholtsi@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger)
- Subject: Re: James Keegan's morality
- Message-ID: <1993Jan9.232008.19391@ncsu.edu>
- Followup-To: talk.abortion
- Sender: news@ncsu.edu (USENET News System)
- Reply-To: dsholtsi@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger)
- Organization: North Carolina State University
- References: <1993Jan9.172802.7769@ncsu.edu> <1993Jan9.214823.6779@crd.ge.com>
- Distribution: na
- Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1993 23:20:08 GMT
- Lines: 31
-
- In article <1993Jan9.214823.6779@crd.ge.com>
- james g keegan jr <keegan@crd.ge.com> writes:
- >dsholtsi@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger) writes:
-
- >> We haven't yet heard whether James Keegan condones the
- >> remarks of a pro-choicer who wished rape on female pro-
- >> lifers.
-
- > prove it,
-
- Do you condone remarks from a pro-choicer who suggested that
- female pro-lifers should be raped?
-
- > since you seem to have defended suzanne's attack of
- > patrick's wife, do you approve of her tactics?
- >
- > do you approve of chaney's tactics in attacking
- > patrick's wife?
-
- You posted an article which suggested that the absence
- of criticism implies acceptance of a person's remarks.
- Since we haven't heard your criticism of the pro-choicer
- who wished rape on female pro-lifers, it seems logical
- to conclude from your post that your failure to criticize
- that pro-choicer implies acceptance of his remarks. My
- approval or disapproval of somebody else's remarks is
- irrelevant to the current topic.
-
-
- Doug Holtsinger
-
-