home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!crdgw1!rdsunx.crd.ge.com!pan!keegan
- From: keegan@pan.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr)
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Subject: Re: An argument for better sex ed
- Message-ID: <1993Jan9.233232.8340@crd.ge.com>
- Date: 9 Jan 93 23:32:32 GMT
- References: <1993Jan8.185215.12992@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> <1993Jan8.221548.28016@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu> <1993Jan8.234624.9919@ncsu.edu>
- Sender: usenet@crd.ge.com (Required for NNTP)
- Reply-To: james g keegan jr <keegan@crd.ge.com>
- Distribution: na
- Organization: T.S.A.K.C.
- Lines: 65
- Nntp-Posting-Host: pan.crd.ge.com
- Disclaimer: i speak for myself only, unless noted otherwise
-
- dsholtsi@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger) writes:
- -> In article <1993Jan8.221548.28016@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu>
- -> sfm@manduca.neurobio.arizona.edu (Stephen Matheson) writes:
- -> > Here it is! I found it! James Keegan wrote a post called "anti-
- -> > choice morality" based (in part) on this atrocity. He suggested
- -> > that the failure of pro-life folks to condemn Suzanne's behavior
- -> > was evidence for some sort of moral compromise. Now I see why.
- -> >
- -> > Suzanne: your comment is sick. Your vindictiveness is unhealthy.
- -> > I think an apology is in order.
- ->
- -> Allow me to clue you in to a little game that the pro-choicers
- -> like to play. The game is called "enrage the opposition". The
- -> idea is to hurl as many insults and hurtful remarks at Ms. Forgach
- -> as possible so that she'll respond in kind. When Ms. Forgach
- -> does respond with small flames, she gets accused of being
- -> "hateful", "sick", etc..
-
- is this what you refer to as a "small flame?"
-
- "Yeah. She ain't yours. She's another man's, a man who's been
- with your wife. I hope it drives you crazy."
- forgach@noao.edu (Suzanne Forgach)
- <1993Jan7.224312.5846@noao.edu>
-
- -> Often times, the game is played in which a pro-choicer verbally abuses
- -> Ms. Forgach for no apparent reason other than her views on abortion.
- -> Ms. Forgach then responds with a small flame, and the pro-choicers
- -> gang up on her and blow her small flame way out of proportion so as
- -> to portray her as being more wicked than the Wicked Witch of the West.
- -> In this particular example, we have Patrick Humphrey as the antagonizer,
- -> who has insulted Ms. Forgach on numerous past
- -> occassions.
-
- is this the "small flame" you're talking about?
-
- "Yeah. She ain't yours. She's another man's, a man who's been
- with your wife. I hope it drives you crazy."
- forgach@noao.edu (Suzanne Forgach)
- <1993Jan7.224312.5846@noao.edu>
-
- -> I feel that Ms. Forgach has received such horrible treatment from
- -> pro-choicers that they really don't have any moral standing to accuse
- -> her of being "hateful". They are the ones who are "hateful", IMO.
- -> I'm actually kind of surprised that Ms. Forgach has been as polite
- -> as she has been towards these people.
-
- ----------
- "All fetuses _are_ white. "White" means lack of pigment. Black
- newborns are born white, and turn black shortly thereafter."
- Suzanne Forgach <1991Jun13.232919.9128@noao.edu>
-
- -----
- "I was thinking of names like stupid twit etc. but changed my
- mind. There are no words that can describe my contempt for you
- Suzanne. In your white bread little world passing judgement on
- people you neither know nor care about. Never will you ever if
- your God smiles on you have to go through the things some women
- will have to contend with to make it from day to the next.
- Walk a mile in their shoes, Suzanne. Life might look very
- different to yo on the othr side."
-
- "Who in the hell do you think you are. You are contemptable, no
- worse you are beneath contempt."
- Caryn S. Prater <1991Jun15.031529.12404@swbatl.sbc.com>
-