home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!sdd.hp.com!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!news.cso.uiuc.edu!uxa.cso.uiuc.edu!vengeanc
- From: vengeanc@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu ()
- Subject: Re: Spoken Like a True ProLifer
- References: <C04xGM.Cpz@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <1993Jan1.055325.1509@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> <C0CBty.n1y@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <1993Jan4.181426.5588@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
- Message-ID: <C0FF9F.En8@news.cso.uiuc.edu>
- Sender: usenet@news.cso.uiuc.edu (Net Noise owner)
- Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
- Date: Wed, 6 Jan 1993 09:48:50 GMT
- Lines: 42
-
- mcochran@nyx.cs.du.edu (Mark A. Cochran) writes:
-
- >In article <C0CBty.n1y@news.cso.uiuc.edu> vengeanc@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu () writes:
-
- >>I freely admit that a preborn baby human being is not LEGALLY defined
- >>as a "person". The moral and scientific evidence that it SHOULD be
- >>defined as such has been beat to death already.
- >>
- >When? All I've ever seen is medical and scientific evidence that it is
- >*not* a person. As in, not sentient etc. Care to show otherwise?
-
- Is a newborn sentient? Is a person in a coma sentient? Is a sleeper
- sentient? Is a mentally retarded person sentient?
-
- >>
- >I see that in addition to not being able to define the limits of your
- >own body, you don't under stand the difference between pro-choice and
- >pro-abortion. Gordon is pro-abort, I'm pro-choice.
-
- Conceded.
-
- >But since you claim you're looking things up and curing your
- >ignorance, then post some of this mythical evidence that shows that a
- >fetus is a person.
-
- I really don't see the point. It's all been said before. Viability,
- personhood, quickening, whatever...
-
- If God himself plopped down in front of you and said abortion was wrong
- you'd still find a way to ignore Him.
-
- [Lotsa Lotsa stuff deleted]
-
-
- >--
- > Mark Cochran merlin@eddie.ee.vt.edu
-
-
- Edward Simmonds
-
- - standard disclaimers -
-
-