NetNews Usenet Archive 1993 #1/NN_1993_1.iso/spool/sci/physics/22415

Text File | 1993-01-09 | 8.9 KB | 197 lines

Newsgroups: sci.physics
Path: sparky!uunet!destroyer!news.iastate.edu!pv343f.vincent.iastate.edu!abian
From: [e-mail] (Alexander Abian)
Subject: TIME HAS INERTIA     (A1) EXPERIMENTALLY VERIFIED 30 TIMES/DAY
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Summary: PROTOZOAN FOSSILS LECTURE ABIAN ON TRUTH LOGIC AND CONSISTENCY
Keywords: THE CRAVE FOR GAINING A FEELING OF SECURITY
Sender: [e-mail] (USENET News System)
Organization: Iowa State University, Ames IA
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1993 19:55:17 GMT
Lines: 184

TIME HAS INERTIA

STRICTLY FOR DEVOTED READERS OF: TIME HAS INERTIA

As a consequence of (A3) everything (animate or inanimate, from  part-
icles to galaxies) innately and inexorably manifests:

(A1)  THE TENDENCY OF MAINTAINING THE STATUS QUO, REACTION TO PROVOC-
      ATION AND THE TENDENCY OF MAINTAINING AGAIN A STATUS QUO

An overwhelming number of the readers of TIME HAS INERTIA  relentlessly
demanded and demand from me a proof of the EXPERIMENTAL VERIFIABILITY and
PREDICTABILITY OF (A1).

Here is my proof.

I was very busy during the past 10 days or so and did not have time to post
energetically in  TIME HAS INERTIA.

Only very late at nights I had some time to scan thru sci.physics postings.

There was a considerable lull in the usual huge amount of postings for
advising the readers to kill-file TIME HAS INERTIA".

Also there was a considerable lull in devising various means to create
a secure abode for  Maintaining the Status Quo of Physical Sacro Sanct
Orthodox Principles such as "Preservation of Energy" , "Preservation
of Angular Momentum" , "Preservation of Maxwell, Einstein, Schroedinger
equations and especially "Planck's  and Hubble's constants".  A secure
abode which will exclude crackpots of types of Copernicus, Galileo, Newton,
Einstein and Schroedinger.

I told my colleague that I will prove to him the predictability powers
of (A1) and its experimental verifiability.  I told my colleague that
based on (A1), I predict that if  I post an article concerning the fact
that I consider
                 THE  ORDINARY LANGUAGE

as the most outstanding intellectual achievement of the human species,
which is much more profound, much more essential than any "scientific"
language (including Mathematics) - and I told to my colleague that even if
I post
                 THE ORDINARY LANGUAGE

posting in Subject: TIME HAS INERTIA  which by the majority of "The
Guardians of Reality, Truth, Science and Physics"  is considered a
crackpot Subject, and even if I  warn the readers with:

        RESTRICTED TO THE DEVOTED READERS OF  TIME HAS INERTIA

there will be a hysterical reaction on the part of "the Guardians of
Reality , Truth, Consistency, Science and Physics" to my posting

                  THE ORDINARY LANGUAGE.

   Indeed, the predictability of (A1) was established.  You can check for
yourself that the volume of postings for " organizing alternative groups
such as science physics ..., science physics ****, science Physics ###,
etc" after my posting of  ORDINARY LANGUAGE on 1-8-93,  suddenly became
more than 30/day.

    Of course  the "Guardians of Reality, Truth, Consistency and Physics"
will tell you that it was just a coincidence!

    During the 10 day lull prior to my PROVOCATIVE POSTING ABOUT THE
ORDINARY LANGUAGE - things were going back to the STATUS QUO  for
the "Guardians of the Physics".  Then  Abian's provocation - which was
followed by a sudden flurry and  gusts of commotion as a  REACTION TO MY
PROVOCATION  and the  GUARDIAN PROTOZOANS OF TRUTH, PHYSICS, REALITY,
CONSISTENCY AND LOGIC started to have emotional climaxes.

    Do you need more proof of the PREDICTABILITY AND THE EXPERIMENTAL
VERIFIABILITY OF  (A1)  ?  If yes, JUST EXAMINE YOUR REACTION TO
MY  PRESENT PROVOCATIVE POSTING !!!  Do you see a remarkable similarity
between your reaction and the REACTION OF PLUTONIUM UPON THE PROVOCATION
OF BEING STRUCK ! OR THE REACTION OF TRITIUM UPON THE PROVOCATION  OF
BEING STRUCK !!   Do you see the similarity ?

    Yes, it is high time to introduce  (A1) and especially  (A3)

(A3)   The primal cause of every action of everything (from a
       particle to a galaxy,m animate,ate or inanimate objects, etc) is

(A3)    GAINING A FEELING OF SECURITY

into Classical physics.  There is no escape. No matter how you twist
and twirl your outmoded, orthodox principles of  SR, GR, QM  you will
not see the light, you will not hit upon the real explanation, upon
the crux of the Physic.  Same will be the case for Computers.  Most
probably instead of silicon chips -  living cells will
be the computer chips of the future with brain -type substance sup-
porting them. Although I am not that sure.

   THE ORDINARY LANGUAGE is the protoplasm of our Rational thinking
our reasoning and our intellectual activities.  Please do not
lecture me on FORMAL LANGUAGES, on Formal systems, on Mathematical
Logic, on Propositional Calculus, on Predicate Calculus, on Rules of
Inference,on what a Theorem is, on the Consistency, on Model Theory, on
proof Theory, on Decidability,- please,  all these are very well known
to me. Just go to your Library and check out

   BIBLIOGRAPHY OF MATHEMATICAL LOGIC - SPRINGER-VERLAG

    and look into Author index in

     vol.1  Classical Logic
     vol.2  Nonclassical Logics
     vol.3  Model Theory
     vol.4. Recursion Theory
     vol.5  Set Theory

you will find in all those volumes at least 30-40 references to my papers.
  So, please do not teach me "Logic" or "Logical thinking" or above all
"Mathematical Logic",  "Consistency", "Decidability" etc., etc.

    All the above Formalism does not reveal the emotional depth of
reasoning. The marvel of UNDERSTANDING  that THE ORDINARY LANGUAGE
provides.

    You can manipulate  with symbolism  very ingeniously - but
no " Formal Mathematics"  can make you feel, understand, bond
emotionally to the depth of beautiful, impressive reasoning.  The
formalism seldom will tell you  THAT ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS ARE SO NICE
SO SMOOTH THAT LOCALLY THEY ARE ALMOST LIKE  CONSTANT FUNCTIONS.
THE FORMALISM WILL SELDOM TELL YOU THAT IN THE REAL VARIABLE CASE THE
ONLY TRUTHFUL ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS ARE STRAIGHT LINES, they are the ones that
are uniquely determined by their values at the boundary (two end points
of an interval) and they are the ones that when bounded on the whole
x-axis reduce to a constant (Liouville's Theorem). AND THEY ARE THE ONES
WHEN  perpendicular, say,  at x = s  on the x-axis  (i.e, with
an essential singularity at  s)   ASSUME EVERY VALUE AT x = s !!!
i.e., Picard's  Great Theorem.

    So, believe my judgment when I say that (A1) to (A4) are inevitable and
that
                         TIME HAS INERTIA

is by far much more revolutionary idea than  E = mcc.

    And, please don't  teach me CONSISTENCY.  Consistency is not the jewel
of anything.  We live in inconsistencies.  In fact "CONSISTENCY" in a
broad sense is "MENTAL LIMITATION - a POLICE ACTION "  Very consistent
in their pursuits were   Police inspector  JAVERT in Les Miserables and
policeman  SPOLETTA in  Puccini's TOSCA.

    So, please do not be consistency pursuing JAVERTs AND SPOLETTA's to
me.
   We live in inconsistencies:  EVERY ONE SPEAKS ABOUT  FREEDOM OF
SPEECH "  But if  I say that  "Using my Freedom of speech I will
harass you by constantly telling you -  SHUT UP"  you will be annoyed ,
at best you will also tell me " I too, using my Freedom of Speech
am telling you - SHUT UP". Then THE BRUTE FORCE  (and not the freedom
of speech) WILL end up the dispute. Contradicting that the CIVILIZATION
AND DEMOCRACY PROMOTES THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH !!
    By the way, Churchill said that "Democracy is a bad political system
but any other system is worse".  I disagree with Churchill I know of
a better political system than Democracy.
    Also, please do not give me lectures on  consistency, contra-
dictions  and the like.

      your lecturing me on consistency and contradiction is like
      a fossil of a PROTOZOAN (which reproduces only by subdivision)
      would lecture a specialist of the oldest profession on how to
      adulterate!

  I  know that everybody will be reading this posting despite the
fact that I said:  RESTRICTED TO THE DEVOTED READERS OF TIME HAS
INERTIA - because my postings always have a content- and people like
to gain knowledge because THAT MAKES THEM FEEL SECURE !!!

   I am exhausted it is time to stop and listen to the 24-th
etude of Chopin in  A minor.

   I will post tonight or most probably tomorrow  GODEL's THEOREMS  and
then there will be a pause on my part for some 10 days since I will
be in the meetings and after that it will depend on how would I feel.

   With love.
                                         Alexander Abian
--
   The tendency of maintaining the status-quo, Reaction to provocation and
                The tendency of maintaining again a status-quo.
    TIME HAS INERTIA  and some energy is lost to move Time forward
  E = mcc  (Einstein)    must be replaced by    E = m(0) exp(-At) (Abian)