home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: gnu.misc.discuss
- Path: sparky!uunet!think.com!enterpoop.mit.edu!bloom-picayune.mit.edu!athena.mit.edu!zhu
- From: zhu@athena.mit.edu (Erin Zhu)
- Subject: Re: Fund raising at the FSF
- Message-ID: <1993Jan4.071214.759@athena.mit.edu>
- Sender: news@athena.mit.edu (News system)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: gevalt.mit.edu
- Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- References: <1993Jan3.170815.18962@husc3.harvard.edu> <C0B6qq.B2F@news.udel.edu> <1i8cvgINN9ar@shelley.u.washington.edu>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 07:12:14 GMT
- Lines: 47
-
- In article <1i8cvgINN9ar@shelley.u.washington.edu>
- tzs@stein.u.washington.edu (Tim Smith) writes:
-
- >johnston@me.udel.edu (Bill Johnston) writes:
-
- >>one has no billing. Finding a better way to copyright and distribute
- >>software and source code is a subject that many have talked about;
- >>the FSF (including "men" like Stallman for those who insist on
- >>personalizing) have actually taken a public position and done
- >>their best to put their ideas into practice. Few political action
- >>groups have so successfully worked both the theoretical and practical
- >>sides of a difficult problem.
-
- >>If you have a better idea, please share it; we're interested.
-
- >How about the way X is distributed?
-
- Exceedingly good point.
-
- If I may quote from the X11R4 release notes:
-
- "Permission to use, copy, modify, distribute, and sell this software
- and its documentation for any purpose is hereby granted without fee,
- provided that the above copyright notice appear in all copies and that
- both that copyright notice and this permission notice appear in
- supporting documentation, and that the name of M.I.T. not be used in
- advertising or publicity pertaining to distribution of the software
- without specific, written prior permission. M.I.T. makes no
- representations about the suitability of this software for any
- purpose. It is provided "as is" without express or implied warranty.
-
- This software is not subject to any license of the American Telephone
- and Telegraph Company or of the Regents of the University of
- California."
-
- I believe this qualifies as an example of practical distribution of
- free software which has neither hindered the popularity of the program
- nor resulted in any excessive competition with copied or adapted
- commercial versions.
-
- Now if somebody would just get it into his head that Mikhail is not
- merely interested in the semantical purity of the word "free", but
- rather the concept of freedom as it applies to so-called "freely-
- distributed" software, this discussion might become more intelligent.
-
- --Erin
-
-