home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!netnews.upenn.edu!dsinc!satalink!john.will
- From: john.will@satalink.com (John Will)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
- Subject: Re: Windows NT vs OS/2: D
- Message-ID: <5979.1100.uupcb@satalink.com>
- Date: 7 Jan 93 10:52:00 GMT
- Reply-To: john.will@satalink.com (John Will)
- Organization: Datamax/Satalink Connection * Ivyland, PA (215) 443-9434
- Lines: 19
-
- RB>I use OS/2 because I LIKE a command-
- RB>line and I need DOS. OS/2 gives me MUCH more reliable DOS session with gobs
- RB>of available memory. My DOS sessions under Windows have about 349K free.
- RB>Under OS/2, over 600K. On the other hand, Windows is a much more
- RB>"comfortable" environment.
-
- I think you need some work on your Windows configuration, I have loads
- of drivers and I get lots more than that! I can really get more, but
- I'm too lazy to tweak it anymore.
-
- Psp Cnt Size Name Command Line Hooked Vectors
- ---- --- ------ ---------- ------------------- --------------------------------
- 2 38,880 DOS
- ... stuff deleted ...
- 1291 2 579,696 ---free---
- 655,360 ---total--
- ---
- . KingQWK 1.05 # 97 . Are you a Klingon, or is that a turtle on your head?
-
-