home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.org.eff.talk
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!eff!mnemonic
- From: mnemonic@eff.org (Mike Godwin)
- Subject: Re: legal question re anonymity online
- Message-ID: <1993Jan7.205816.26710@eff.org>
- Originator: mnemonic@eff.org
- Sender: usenet@eff.org (NNTP News Poster)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: eff.org
- Organization: Electronic Frontier Foundation
- References: <C0I1Is.1yz@world.std.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 20:58:16 GMT
- Lines: 39
-
- In article <C0I1Is.1yz@world.std.com> mkj@world.std.com (Mahatma Kane-Jeeves) writes:
-
- >Infuriated and in desperate need of financial help, John sues the
- >BELL. My question: Does he have a case?
-
- Absent more fact than this, almost certainly not.
-
- >Suppose John can show that although the BELL management denied
- >pseudonymity to most users, they granted it to certain people
- >such as celebrities or others with special status. Would this
- >strengthen John's case?
-
- No.
-
- >Suppose John can show that other BELL users have previously
- >suffered defamation, harassment or other problems as a result of
- >real-name exposure on the BELL, and that BELL management was
- >aware, or should have been aware, of at least some of these
- >problems. Would this strengthen John's case?
-
- No.
-
- Absent actual negligence on the BELL's part, it won't be held liable.
- Merely imposing nonanonymity as a policy and as a condition of the
- subscription contract does not make the BELL negligent. This is true
- whether or not the policy is applied in the same way to everyone.
-
-
-
- --Mike
-
-
-
-
- --
- Mike Godwin, |"I'm waiting for the one-man revolution
- mnemonic@eff.org| The only one that's coming."
- (617) 864-0665 |
- EFF, Cambridge | --Robert Frost
-