home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
- Path: sparky!uunet!news.univie.ac.at!bim.itc.univie.ac.at!tom
- From: tom@bim.itc.univie.ac.at (Tom Kovar)
- Subject: Re: Failed compile of 2.3PL11 on AIX 3.1.6
- Message-ID: <1993Jan9.140008.3910@newssrv.edvz.univie.ac.at>
- Sender: news@newssrv.edvz.univie.ac.at (News System - Vienna University)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: bim.itc.univie.ac.at
- Organization: Inst.of Theor.Chemistry,Univ.of Vienna,Austria
- X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3
- References: <1993Jan8.161530.24413@panix.com>
- Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1993 14:00:08 GMT
- Lines: 17
-
- dans@panix.com (Dan Simoes) writes:
- :
- : The local c guru said the problem was with the function prototyping at
- : the beginning of the program (addr_util.c), so I commented out the
- : second function declaration line in there:
- :
- : >char *strtok(), *strcpy(), *strcat(), *strncpy(), *index(), *rindex();
- :
- : and it compiled. So, do I need to do this for *every* .c program?
- : I tried using c89 and xlc instead, but they all bomb out.
-
-
- No, you do not have to do it all. Either start the compiler with
- -U__STR__, or use the bsdcc configuration of the c-compiler (has been discussed
- in this group and in comp.unix.aix many times)
-
- Tom
-