NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #31/NN_1992_31.iso/spool/rec/photo/22890

Text File | 1993-01-03 | 1.4 KB | 37 lines

Newsgroups: rec.photo
Path: sparky!uunet!think.com!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!rudi
From: [e-mail] (Rudolf Usselmann)
Subject: Developing color negatives & prints
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Keywords:  Developing color negatives & prints
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  (408 241-9760 guest)
Distribution: ba
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1993 20:32:03 GMT
Lines: 25



I followed the thread about different photo labs a while back, and have
a follow up comment and question:

I brought 3 rolls of color film (Ektar 100 & Kodak Gold 200) to
"Imagery Group" in Fremont, CA. They send them out to Kodalux.
Almost ALL negatives came out underexposed and all the prints
where more or less useless. I was very disappointed since this
is the first time I got such a bad result. A friend told me they
should have adjusted their processing and still produce something
more reasonable. Here's my Question:
Which photolab in the bay area will do a negative by negative
evaluation when developing negatives & producing prints ?
Or do all of them do it automaticly and I just got bad luck ?
What should I look out for when selecting a photo lab ?
I really doubt that it was my fault that the negatives came out
that bad (two or four per roll may be - but not all 3 rolls !).

Thanks for all pointers !

rudi
[e-mail]
home: [phone]
work: [phone]