home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.games.mecha
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!lunatic
- From: lunatic@netcom.com (Lunatic Johnathan Bruce E'Sex)
- Subject: BTECH: "Efficiency" (Was: Re: MECH: Heavy Hammer)
- Message-ID: <1993Jan2.205601.23247@netcom.com>
- Organization: Netcom; Renegade User
- References: <C03oy9.DvM@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <C08s53.Iu2@newsflash.concordia.ca>
- Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1993 20:56:01 GMT
- Lines: 37
-
- In article <C08s53.Iu2@newsflash.concordia.ca> kgnome@cs.concordia.ca (MATIS stephane) writes:
- [Moved up]
- > Eff is measured by Total Custom Cost / Combat Value / 1000.
-
-
- ][nteresting. I think I'd rather compute an efficiency value that's
- the inverse of that, though. That is, (Combat Value * 1000) / Total
- Unit Cost. That way, the better you are, the closer you get to 1 from
- BELOW. Using the inverse of your equation, you get the following:
-
- > $13,750,733 is the C-Bills on WHM-6X Heavy Hammer at 4029 Combat
- > Value. Efficiency is 3.41.
-
- Inv. efficiency = .293
-
- > $ 7,161,533 is the C-Bills on WHM-7X Heavy Hammer at 3959 Combat
- > Value. Efficiency is 1.81.
-
- Inv. efficiency = .553
-
- > Now, you can make this that much more munchkin by making the
- > internal structure Endo steel, having 13 Double Heat sinks and
- > CASEing the AMS system. This would be the final WHM-7X that I'd
- > build
- >
- > $ 7,419,933 is the C-Bills at 4506 Combat Value. Efficiency is
- > 1.65.
-
- Inv. efficiency = .607
-
- |\|ot that I use C-Bill cost or Combat Values for anything, anyway.
-
- --
- _______________________________________________________
- / -= Lunatic Johnathan Bruce E'Sex (: /
- / lunatic@netcom.com GEnie: LUNATIC CI$: 76170,672 /
- /______________________________________________________/
-