home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.games.mecha
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!news.cso.uiuc.edu!uxa.cso.uiuc.edu!dv52151
- From: dv52151@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (RedSwordTarga)
- Subject: Re: Which weapon is best? (Was: Re: btech lrm)
- References: <1992Dec18.091957.17823@netcom.com> <1h3al5INNa8d@golem.wcc.govt.nz> <BzMw60.Lt4@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <1992Dec25.013509.7246@netcom.com>
- Message-ID: <BzzAo9.GGz@news.cso.uiuc.edu>
- Sender: usenet@news.cso.uiuc.edu (Net Noise owner)
- Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
- Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 16:48:08 GMT
- Lines: 14
-
- lunatic@netcom.com (Lunatic Johnathan Bruce E'Sex) writes:
- > _
- > /-\s you can see, the Pulse ML actually beats the ER ML for range
- > everywhere except at ranges beyond 12, PLUS it has that nice 2 less
- > to-hit on ranges below 5. It may weigh a ton more, but it does 1 less
- > heat. Using regular heat sinks, they're even. Using double heat sinks,
- > the Pulse ML is only down half a ton. (Reminds me of caomparisons
- > between the PPC and the AC/5, when BattleTech/Droids first came out. :)
-
- Yes, but that extra ton really counts a lot. You can run 5 ER Mediums and
- a targeting (sp?) computer for 6 tons. That only gets you 3 Pulses.
-
- Axly
-
-