home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!gatech!paladin.american.edu!darwin.sura.net!seismo!willmann
- From: willmann@seismo.CSS.GOV (Raymond Willemann)
- Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.soc
- Subject: Re: new year's resolutions
- Message-ID: <51728@seismo.CSS.GOV>
- Date: 31 Dec 92 14:34:22 GMT
- References: <725733330.AA08560@urchin.fidonet.org>
- Sender: usenet@seismo.CSS.GOV
- Organization: Center for Seismic Studies, Arlington, VA
- Lines: 31
- Nntp-Posting-Host: honer.css.gov
-
-
- In article <725733330.AA08560@urchin.fidonet.org>, Howard.Gerber@f88.n106.z1.fidonet.org (Howard Gerber) writes:
- |> Gregory D. Surbeck <gsurbeck@eng.umd.edu> writes:
- |>
- |> GDS> My personal favorite solution: planned, unmarked, wide right lanes.
- |> GDS> What's wrong with them (to be read with the same tone of voice as my
- |> GDS> what's wrong with bikeways question -- neutral)?
- |>
- |> There's nothing wrong with building such roads. They're probably the
- |> safest place for cyclists to ride. Many rural highways in Texas are of
- |> that type. Wider outside lanes have the advantage that road surface lasts
- |> longer, since motorists have less tendency to drive off the edge of the
- |> paved surface.
-
- I had the impression that the wide shoulders on 2-lane rural
- highways in Texas were because of the startling (to a New York
- native) practice of pulling onto the shoulder to let faster cars
- pass. This makes sense for tractors, but in 3 years I never got
- used to cars traveling 55 mph pulling aside to let me by. It was
- very unnerving for me to drive on the shoulder at 60 mph to let
- even faster cars pass. But this was the local custom and I
- learned to do it, since the alternative was to be dangerously
- tailgated because of my discourteous behavior. (I never could
- bring myself to pull aside at night, convinced that I would run
- off a narrow bridge over a creek, into a disabled car, or perhaps
- even into a cyclist.)
-
- In any event, this road design is certainly better for cyclists
- than the typical design in Maryland, where shoulders are usually
- gravel or nonexistent. Would the same longevity argument apply
- in northern states, where frost wedging takes a heavier toll?
-