NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #31/NN_1992_31.iso/spool/rec/arts/movies/36023

Internet Message Format | 1992-12-22 | 3.8 KB

Path: sparky!uunet!comp.vuw.ac.nz!waikato.ac.nz!hist1261
From: [e-mail]
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies
Subject: Re: Oliver Stone's  THE BIBLE
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 23 Dec 92 11:23:51 +1300
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Organization: University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
Lines: 54

In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Bakayaroo Banzai) writes:
> In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] writes:
>>In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Bakayaroo Banzai) writes:
>>> In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] writes:
>>>>In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (William Harmon Thompson) writes:
>
> [........]
>>Okay, I've got to bite here - apologies if it's the wrong newsgroup, but then
>>I didn't start it (there's a bit of school yard logic right off).  What
>>"provoked" my statement was the posturing of dear old William who seems
>>desperately in need of a screening of "The Life of Brian" or perhaps even
>>"The Last Temptation of Christ" (that is if his good book does not prohibit
>>it).  Whether or not he is "correct" in his religious intrepretation is, I
>>should imagine, quite another matter, certainly involving a little more than
>>the perusal of a single volume of dubiously translated material.  I responded
>>to the perceptible assertion in Bill's posting that if the big J.C. voted in
>>the last U.S. presidential election he would have been a Bush man.
>>
> You're reading an awful lot into both William's post and mine. Rather than
> talking about films you seem to be interested in turning this group into
> your own little political soapbox. William related his post to an on-
> going discussion about casting Christ in an Oliver Stone movie. Your
> post relates to nothing except some rather gross prejudices on your part.
>
>>That was about it.  Now if Herr Marchese wants to get all huffy and slag off
>>the small little islands of my birth he is most welcome, although I can't see
>>how the good gentlemen could possibly link it to my original posting.  We in
>>New Zealand are quite accustomed to sheep jokes, and the nuclear policy is
>>about to be thrown out the window anyway (not that it particularly bothers me
>>one way or the other).  If I were to be tempted down to that low level myself
>>I could of course remember the immortal words of Basil Fawlty and "not mention
>>the war".
>>
> You can mention the "war" all you want. I'm an American, not a German.
> My disparaging of NZ would be as uncalled-for as your characterization
> of William based on one paragraph of his post, hence the point.
> If you want to post immaterial rants and childish political-baiting here
> I guarantee you'll get flamed for it so take your lumps. William had a
> point, if you disagree with it state your reasons or go away.
> The only one who seems to be "posturing" here is you.
>
> *******************************************************************************
> *  "Supernatural, perhaps...Baloney, perhaps not" - Bela Lugosi               *
> *******************************************************************************
> Matt Marchese        The opinions expressed here are not those of my employer, *
> Cray Research          my wife, my church, or myself...But they are the opinions *
> DKRZ                of Elvis as revealved to me through the medium of my pet  *
> Hamburg, Germany    hamster, Lee Harvey Oswald...                             *
> *******************************************************************************

Merry Christmas Matt.  You could use a little good cheer.

Richard.