home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky news.groups:24782 soc.motss:53316
- Newsgroups: news.groups,soc.motss
- Path: sparky!uunet!think.com!paperboy.osf.org!coren
- From: coren@speed.osf.org (Robert Coren)
- Subject: Re: Soc.Motss.* / Automoderation.
- Message-ID: <1992Dec21.212427.21674@osf.org>
- Sender: news@osf.org (USENET News System)
- Organization: Open Software Foundation
- References: <1992Dec15.161939.27056@osf.org> <1992Dec15.190827.24034@spdcc.com> <1h0dpbINNfp@smurf.sti.com> <1992Dec20.103142.17635@macc.wisc.edu>
- Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 21:24:27 GMT
- Lines: 17
-
- In article <1992Dec20.103142.17635@macc.wisc.edu>, anderson@macc.wisc.edu (Jess Anderson) writes:
- > In article <1h0dpbINNfp@smurf.sti.com> dgreen@smurf.sti.com
- > (Dan R. Greening) writes:
- >
- > O spectre from the distant past!
- >
- > >[Jess (Anderson), Bob Donahue, Robert Coren, and Paul Asente suggest
- > > automoderation to get rid of most anti-gay traffic in soc.motss, limiting to
- > > NON cross-posted articles.]
- >
- > Not quite right, old bean; I had no part in an
- > auto-moderation scheme. Actually, I oppose it.
-
- I, as well, said nothing whatever about moderation, auto- or
- otherwise. I *did* talk about the evils of cross-posting, and how to
- prevent it, but I believe that I promoted voluntary abstinence, and
- the verbal encouragement thereof.
-