home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!usenet.ucs.indiana.edu!bronze.ucs.indiana.edu!jgraham
- From: jgraham@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (the End)
- Subject: Re: Apple monitor model #M1212 (Q)
- Message-ID: <C08Hs6.8qI@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>
- Sender: news@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu (USENET News System)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: bronze.ucs.indiana.edu
- Organization: Indiana University
- References: <1992Dec22.163811.214@nhqvax.hq.nasa.gov> <C03AoK.CIv@rice.edu> <1992Dec31.103356.3508@fys.ruu.nl> <C06xJB.5BC@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> <ibhan.725925628@husc.harvard.edu>
- Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1993 16:00:06 GMT
- Lines: 40
-
- In <ibhan.725925628@husc.harvard.edu> ibhan@husc8.harvard.edu (Ishir Bhan) writes:
-
- >jgraham@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (the End) writes:
-
- >>It is my understanding that both monitors have the exact same SONY picture
- >>tube and the new 14" has better magnetic sheilding and a built-in tilt-swivel
- >>base. It is marginally more expensive via the academic channels ($500 vs $435).
-
- >>Could you substantiate your claim that the new 14' uses a flatter tube ?
-
- >The 14" does seem to have a flatter tube, but it's hard to tell. There is
- >definately a difference in the image quality (14" is better).
-
-
- Again, the only difference between the two monitors, technically speaking,
- is the electronics used to generate the beam, making the appearence brighter
- with less power consumption and reducing the ELF genreated, and of course
- the swivel stand attached.
-
- Can you substantiate your claim the the tube is "flatter" ? Is this your
- impression or have you seen this info somewhere ?
-
- Thanks,
-
- Jim
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- >--
- > - Ishir Bhan - ibhan@husc.harvard.edu -
- > - - -
- > "The sky and the impossible explode..." -The Cure
-