home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
- Path: sparky!uunet!math.fu-berlin.de!unidui!rrz.uni-koeln.de!Germany.EU.net!mpifr-bonn.mpg.de!specklec.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de!mlelstv
- From: mlelstv@specklec.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de (Michael van Elst)
- Subject: Re: CBM mention on 12/11/92 Computer Chronicles
- Message-ID: <1992Dec28.191337.9754@mpifr-bonn.mpg.de>
- Sender: news@mpifr-bonn.mpg.de
- Nntp-Posting-Host: specklec
- Organization: Max-Planck-Institut f"ur Radioastronomie
- References: <1992Dec28.170704.8316@mpifr-bonn.mpg.de> <1992Dec28.174107.15214@sol.ctr.columbia.edu>
- Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 19:13:37 GMT
- Lines: 13
-
- In <1992Dec28.174107.15214@sol.ctr.columbia.edu> jerry@msi.com (Jerry Shekhel) writes:
- >The greater pixel depth means that more data needs to be transferred during
- >screen updates.
-
- That makes it (relativly) slower. But why is a GUI better or worse if it
- has to transport more or less data during screen updates ?
-
- Regards,
- --
- Michael van Elst
- UUCP: universe!local-cluster!milky-way!sol!earth!uunet!unido!mpirbn!p554mve
- Internet: p554mve@mpirbn.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de
- "A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."
-