home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.os.os2.advocacy:11189 comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy:3540
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!cs.utexas.edu!bcm!lib!oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu!jmaynard
- From: jmaynard@oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu (Jay Maynard)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
- Subject: Re: FCC will proclaim Microsoft is run by Communists! :)
- Message-ID: <8241@lib.tmc.edu>
- Date: 30 Dec 1992 14:18:13 GMT
- References: <AAt38GhqK3@lvvhq.adam.kiev.ua> <1992Dec29.225006.15580@noose.ecn.purdue.edu> <1992Dec29.232921.22559@tc.cornell.edu>
- Sender: usenet@lib.tmc.edu
- Followup-To: comp.os.os2.advocacy
- Organization: UT Health Science Center Houston
- Lines: 19
- Nntp-Posting-Host: oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu
-
- In article <1992Dec29.232921.22559@tc.cornell.edu> bai@msiadmin.cit.cornell.edu (Dov Bai-MSI Visitor) writes:
- >Like many other haters, MS-haters don't care what else they destroy.
- >The only thing they care about is destroying their object of hatred.
- >They may even destroy themselves in the process.
-
- What else, pray tell, would be destroyed if the FTC were to force MS to quit
- forcing system vendors to sell a copy of Windows and DOS with every machine
- they ship, and to force MS apps to quit using undocumented OS calls, besides
- Bill Gates' monopolistic dreams?
-
- >Unlike haters, the constructive critics just go and build something
- >better. It does not look like MS-haters are going to sit and develop
- >a better OS. It is much easier to use the government.
-
- The critics have gone and built something better. It's called OS/2.
- --
- Jay Maynard, EMT-P, K5ZC, PP-ASEL | Never ascribe to malice that which can
- jmaynard@oac.hsc.uth.tmc.edu | adequately be explained by stupidity.
- "Brought to you by the letters O, S, and by the number 2." -- Mike Levis
-