NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #31/NN_1992_31.iso/spool/comp/os/os2/advocacy/10999

Internet Message Format | 1992-12-28 | 4.0 KB

Xref: sparky comp.os.os2.advocacy:10999 comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy:3458
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy
Path: sparky!uunet!think.com!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!moose.cccs.umn.edu!rwh
From: [e-mail] (RICHARD HOFFBECK)
Subject: Re: FCC will proclaim Microsoft is run by Communists! : )
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41
Sender: [e-mail] (Usenet News Administration)
Nntp-Posting-Host: knife.cccs.umn.edu
Reply-To: [e-mail]
Organization: Colon Cancer Control Study, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1992 18:17:00 GMT
Lines: 62

In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Jeff Sicherman) writes:
> In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Randall A Helzerman) writes:
> >In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Lowell Morrison) writes:
> >|> In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Dov Bai-MSI Visitor) writes:
> >|> >In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Jeff Sicherman) writes:
> >|> >
> >|>
> >|> Lots on Standard Oil & Unfair Competition Deleted.
> >
> >|> MS has not kept the prices down, infact if you look at their $8 a unit
> >|> for bundled Windows for Workgroups vs the $100 per station that the
> >|> end user pays, you might suspect that MS is price gouging the end
> >|> user shamelessly.
> >
> >*sigh* is anybody forcing people to buy MS DOS at $100 a copy?  Any sales
> >which go on are completely voluntary between buyer and seller.  Obviously
> >both parties are happy about the price or it wouldn't get sold.  If
> >Microsoft and its customers are happy, why interfere with them?
> >
>
>   Well, this can get pretty complicated with the nuances of anti-trust law
> but there are laws that prohibit manufacturers from discriminating against
> different sellers on *arbitrary* criteria (volume is a valid reason) but
> price fixing and unreasonably controlling the ability and price at which
> your resellers sell the product is generally a no-no. And punishing them
> for not following such anti-competitive practices is also illegal.

Price maintenance agreements are usually used to keep prices high; whereas,
MS is being accused of keep them too low.

> Whether
> MS's bundling agreements fit these situations, I don't know, but such a
> wide gap in wholesale vs. retail prices (which don't manifest themselves
> in the market due to competition) suggest there is something other than
> good-old-American-captialistic-competition operating here.

Its called price discrimination and it is the basis for most real world
competition.  If you can find a fool to pay $495 for a spreadsheet, sell
it to him, then let the mail order places sell to those willing to pay
$295, bookstores sell to students who can only pay $95.  Same thing with
hardcover vs paperback, business coach vs supersaver, and so on.

Actually, I don't see that much difference between $10 a copy for OEMs and
they pick up the cost of the manual vs $50 at Egghead with MS picking up the
cost of the manual, distribution costs and Egghead's cut.  The biggest cut
seems to be the near universal 30% to 35% discount from suggested retail to
mail order.

If MS required Gateway, Zeos, etc. to purchase a retail version of Windows,
or more exactly, refused to provide an OEM license and required that they
buy individual copies with MS manuals, we'd hear arguments on the other side.

--rick

+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| Richard Hoffbeck               INTERNET: [e-mail] |
| Colon Cancer Control Study     ATT     : [phone]         |
| University of Minnesota        CIS     : 72406,521              |
| Minneapolis, MN 55455                                           |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+