home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.arch
- Path: sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!menudo.uh.edu!sugar!ficc!peter
- From: peter@ferranti.com (peter da silva)
- Subject: Re: Any new instructions in a i486?
- Message-ID: <id.RO0W.F1F@ferranti.com>
- Organization: Xenix Support, FICC
- References: <9212130000.AA05447@iecc.cambridge.ma.us> <PCG.92Dec19162224@decb.aber.ac.uk> <BzMEIJ.Anz@pix.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 23:43:50 GMT
- Lines: 11
-
- In article <BzMEIJ.Anz@pix.com> stripes@pix.com (Josh Osborne) writes:
- > I don't think this is the case (but I would love to be wrong...). I beleve
- > the #clocks each insn takes is more like the 386, then the i486.
-
- If NeXTstep does busyloops using instruction timing, I don't want it no
- matter WHAT it looks like.
- --
- Peter da Silva `-_-'
- Ferranti International Controls Corporation 'U`
- Sugar Land, TX 77487-5012 USA
- +1 713 274 5180 "Zure otsoa besarkatu al duzu gaur?"
-