home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!usenet.coe.montana.edu!news.uoregon.edu!oregon.uoregon.edu!dreitman
- From: dreitman@oregon.uoregon.edu (Daniel R. Reitman, Attorney to Be)
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
- Subject: Re: Re: well, pardon me!, Version 5
- Date: 30 Dec 1992 12:17 PST
- Organization: University of Oregon
- Lines: 12
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <30DEC199212171364@oregon.uoregon.edu>
- References: <POLITICS%92123010000253@OHSTVMA.ACS.OHIO-STATE.EDU>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: oregon.uoregon.edu
- News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.41
-
- In article <POLITICS%92123010000253@OHSTVMA.ACS.OHIO-STATE.EDU>,
- K=A*T <MEC038@UKCC.UKY.EDU> writes...
- >One additional point: over the weekend Weinberger said that when he said
- >that the deal was illegal, he didn't know that the President had
- >secretly issued a "Finding" basically allowing such a transaction.
-
- That may be so, but is this really the President's prerogative? I can see an
- advisory opinion by the Attorney General or a secret Executive Order, but a
- Finding suggests a legal opinion that is best placed in the hands of the
- courts.
-
- Dan, ad nauseum
-