home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: ba.politics
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!phil
- From: phil@netcom.com (Phil Ronzone)
- Subject: Re: Gays, the military and "privacy"
- Message-ID: <1992Dec29.223239.21162@netcom.com>
- Organization: Generally in favor of, but mostly random.
- References: <1992Dec28.172215.2424@island.COM> <1992Dec29.051533.16249@netcom.com> <1992Dec29.174104.3073@island.COM>
- Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 22:32:39 GMT
- Lines: 16
-
- In article <1992Dec29.174104.3073@island.COM> guido@island.COM (Guido Marx) writes:
- >This still doesn't answer my original point that maintaining
- >the ban on gays in the military poses a BIG security risk for
- >the U.S. What benefits do we get from this ban which would
- >justify it given that it poses such a risk ?
-
- Anything that one is "ashamed of", i.e., hides from neighbors, coworkers,
- families, is a major susceptibility to blackmail.
-
-
-
-
- --
- I believe Gennifer Flowers.
-
- These opinions are MINE, and you can't have 'em! (But I'll rent 'em cheap ...)
-