home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.math:16972 rec.puzzles:7944 alt.usage.english:9552
- Newsgroups: sci.math,rec.puzzles,alt.usage.english
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!yale!gumby!kzoo!k044477
- From: k044477@hobbes.kzoo.edu (Jamie R. McCarthy)
- Subject: Re: Naming Large Numbers (Re: Negative Zero)
- Message-ID: <1992Dec15.210004.2556@hobbes.kzoo.edu>
- Organization: Kalamazoo College
- References: <1992Dec12.010711.15778@leela.cs.orst.edu> <Dec.15.05.12.50.1992.13518@romulus.rutgers.edu> <1992Dec15.162324.28405@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>
- Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 21:00:04 GMT
- Lines: 24
-
- J.Theodore.Schuerzinger@dartmouth.edu (J. Theodore Schuerzinger) writes:
- >clong@romulus.rutgers.edu (Chris Long) writes:
- >
- >> Eckler, R. "The Only Man Infinity Fears", _Word Ways_ Vol. 19,
- >> Num. 4 (Nov. 1986) p. 252-254
- >>
- >> The largest number given is millitwoillimillionillion, which
- >> can't be written down in standard notation.
- >
- >Why can't it be written down in standard notation? Unless it's
- >irrational or transcendental, one should be able to write it down.
-
- This mathematical hypothesis of yours is as false as your
- linguistic hypotheses.
-
- I submit that one cannot write down, in scientific notation, the number
- x, such that x is the integer component of pi times n, where n is
- sufficiently large. (Take n to be ten to the power of the number of
- atoms in the universe, for instance.)
- --
- Jamie McCarthy Internet: k044477@kzoo.edu AppleLink: j.mccarthy
- "Apple developers will still have access to System 7.1 through the
- monthly Developer CD series, but they may use it only for testing
- and development purposes." - AppleDirect, Nov/Dec 92
-